CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Question about grid independence (2D)

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By MIDHUN@CFD

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   August 7, 2019, 14:25
Default Question about grid independence (2D)
  #1
New Member
 
João de Sousa Bomfim Neto
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Maranguape, Ceará, Brasil
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 8
Joao Bomfim is on a distinguished road
Hi friends,
I am trying to validate a simulation of a VAWT starting with a 2d case. I'm doing the grid independence test, but the grid doesn't converge satisfactorily over a four-mesh range of 40,000 elements to 350,000 elements. The default boot is the same for all meshes. The y+ values for the cells over blade surfaces are smaller than 1, and the turbulence model used is ke realizable with enhanced tratament in the walls. My finnest mesh is in the picture. When I was using CFX, I remember that for a case with two nodes on the z axis (pseudo 2d), the grid converged at about 150 000 to 200 000 elements. So what I would like to know is:
- Doesn't fluent use turbulence models or the laminar case to test the grid?
- Whatever use static or rotating mesh? (Sliding mesh)
- I use second order equations, but can I use first order?
If anyone can advise me more on this subject in fluent I appreciate it because I don't see anything similar to what I got in cfx. Thanks!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg mesh.jpg (194.0 KB, 14 views)
Joao Bomfim is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 14, 2019, 10:52
Default
  #2
Member
 
MIDHUN
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: calicut
Posts: 45
Rep Power: 13
MIDHUN@CFD is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to MIDHUN@CFD
try to get aspect ratio below 600 and dont use RKE with mrf or rotating domains, its not compatible. use sst k w instead .. you can use first order if convergence is slower and try using PRESTO for pressure
Joao Bomfim likes this.
MIDHUN@CFD is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 14, 2019, 12:11
Default
  #3
New Member
 
João de Sousa Bomfim Neto
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Maranguape, Ceará, Brasil
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 8
Joao Bomfim is on a distinguished road
Thanks for your reply!!! Could you tell me why rke is not compatible with rotating mesh? This is first time I see it. Best regards
Joao Bomfim is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 14, 2019, 13:03
Default
  #4
Member
 
MIDHUN
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: calicut
Posts: 45
Rep Power: 13
MIDHUN@CFD is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to MIDHUN@CFD
becoz the swirl component get cancelled
MIDHUN@CFD is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Grid Independence and Node Distribution Chaoticzz Main CFD Forum 2 March 24, 2017 04:26
Experimental data validation and/or grid independence svp Main CFD Forum 5 June 6, 2014 03:24
grid study, important question hamid1 FLUENT 1 August 4, 2013 00:14
Combustion Convergence problems Art Stretton Phoenics 5 April 2, 2002 05:59
Grid Independent Solution Chuck Leakeas Main CFD Forum 2 May 26, 2000 11:18


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:36.