CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Modelling Sand Retention Screen - Results Differing from Literature

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   January 10, 2020, 09:49
Default Modelling Sand Retention Screen - Results Differing from Literature
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2019
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 6
stuey05 is on a distinguished road
I am currently working on my dissertation investigating the performance of a mesh screen to retain sand. Currently I am attempting to recreate the results I have found in a research paper, however, despite replicating the input parameters the results are differing. The images below show the difference in results. The academic paper show the accumulation of particles at the screen, whereas all the particles pass through the screen during my simulation.

Academic Paper Result ("Evaluation of sand screen performance using a discrete element model")

My Results
The first image shows the particles before they reach the screen. The second image shows that the majority of particles pass through the screen apart from the layer of particles which rests on the screen itself

Setup Parameters
I am running a fully transient simulation. I have enabled the discrete phase, continuous phase interaction, and the DEM collision model. The following parameters were also used.
Particle Density - 2500 kg/m^3
Particle Youngs Modulus - 1e8 Nm^-2
Particle Diameter = 100e-6 m
Screen slot width = 250e-6 m
Time step = 1e-5s
Liquid velocity = 0 m/s
Sliding friction coefficient = 0.3
Poisson ratio = 0.25

Any help with explaining why the sand is not retained by the screen or tips on setting up the model will be much appreciated
Thank You,

Last edited by stuey05; January 10, 2020 at 09:52. Reason: Added images
stuey05 is offline   Reply With Quote


dem, discrete, dpm, filter, sand

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Domain Reference Pressure and mass flow inlet boundary AdidaKK CFX 75 August 20, 2018 05:37
CFD in Naval Hydrodynamics, Off-Shore and Wave Modelling with OpenFOAM hjasak OpenFOAM Announcements from Other Sources 2 February 13, 2017 04:59
Problems with Turbulence Modelling: conflicting results when using y+>=300 Tehseen FLUENT 0 March 18, 2016 11:35
Combustion modelling results accuracies Les Main CFD Forum 7 June 1, 2011 08:55
Modelling a screen in Fluent Sushilkumar FLUENT 1 April 15, 2009 12:03

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:49.