CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Modifying the Incident Solar Radiation

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   May 4, 2020, 07:44
Default Modifying the Incident Solar Radiation
  #1
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 35
Rep Power: 6
Morice is on a distinguished road
Evening Guys,

Hope you are all well.

Is there a way that the incident solar radiation can be modified? When I check the contours of incident solar radiation after initialization, I get values of between 1600~1700 W/m2. Which are incorrect for winter conditions.

In the solar model, I specified the global position and dates appropriately and reduced the sunshine factor to 0.038 to reflect the conditions of the experimental day. On applying these settings, in the console in FLUENT, I get normal and diffuse solar irradiations quantities that are almost the same as the experimental values: Direct Normal = 35W/m2 and Diffuse = 77 W/m2.

The global solar radiation was 71 W/m2 at the start of the experiment.

The funny thing is if I turn off radiation and only use energy and turbulence models, the simulation results match the experimental results with just minor discrepancies.

On turning on the radiation model, the temperatures are much higher especially at the top of the greenhouse which aligns with the areas that receive the high incident radiation.

I would like to use the radiation model but reduce the incident radiation to match the experimental data.

There is no option to change it in the GUI and TUI.

Please help.

Thanks, Much appreciated.
Morice is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 5, 2020, 13:08
Default Solar Irradiation
  #2
Senior Member
 
vinerm's Avatar
 
Vinerm
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Nederland
Posts: 2,946
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 35
vinerm will become famous soon enough
Did you choose solar calculator method for Illumination parameters? In that case, it should automatically maintain the position and give the values that you get from the calculator.
__________________
Regards,
Vinerm

PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority.
vinerm is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 5, 2020, 21:07
Default Incorrect Incident Solar Radiation
  #3
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 35
Rep Power: 6
Morice is on a distinguished road
Morning Vinerm,

Thanks for the response, much appreciated.

The global solar radiation at 10 am on the day of the experiment was 71 W/m2. It was a hazy day and the effect of the solar radiation in the greenhouse was minimal to non-existent thus the use of the air heaters in the greenhouse.

As such, the simulation modelled with energy activated and the turbulence model, minus the radiation model, gives simulation results almost similar to the experimental data.

The incident solar radiation at this time should thus be less than 71 W/m2.

According to the experimental data, at around 1 pm in the afternoon, the global solar radiation increased to 250W/m2.

At this time the haze had cleared and this increase in solar radiation resulted in an increase in air temperature at the top half of the greenhouse, at heights of 2m~5m.

I have run transient simulations without the radiation model at these time as well and there is a discrepancy in air temp. values at heights of 2m~5m owing to the lack of additional heat from the solar radiation.

Air temps. are around 5~10 degrees less.

That is why I was hoping to modify the incident radiation to values that reflect the day of the experiment.

Attached are the contours for solar radiation and screenshots of the solar calculator and radiation model selection & inputs.

Thanks for the assistance, much appreciated.

Kind Regards
Attached Images
File Type: jpg ICM-1-00180.jpg (51.4 KB, 29 views)
File Type: jpg Untitled 1.jpg (169.8 KB, 38 views)
File Type: jpg Untitled.jpg (153.0 KB, 34 views)
Morice is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 6, 2020, 04:20
Default Radiation Modeling
  #4
Senior Member
 
vinerm's Avatar
 
Vinerm
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Nederland
Posts: 2,946
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 35
vinerm will become famous soon enough
Are you using any radiation model or just using solar radiation to apply a heat flux? If latter, then you don't need to use solar calculator or radiation model, since you already know the time and flux profile. Just apply a transient profile to the top boundary. However, if you are also solving for radiation using a radiation model, say DO, then you can use the UDF you mentioned. Either use compiler for that or remove Message command. Message command is not necessary for UDF to work. Try C standard printf in place of Message; that might work with interpreter.
__________________
Regards,
Vinerm

PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority.
vinerm is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 6, 2020, 04:39
Default Radiation Modelling
  #5
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 35
Rep Power: 6
Morice is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by vinerm View Post
Are you using any radiation model or just using solar radiation to apply a heat flux? If latter, then you don't need to use solar calculator or radiation model, since you already know the time and flux profile. Just apply a transient profile to the top boundary. However, if you are also solving for radiation using a radiation model, say DO, then you can use the UDF you mentioned. Either use compiler for that or remove Message command. Message command is not necessary for UDF to work. Try C standard printf in place of Message; that might work with interpreter.
Thank you Vinerm for your response, much appreciated.

I am solving for radiation inside the greenhouse and as such the DO radiation model was selected.

I used the standard printf initially but that didn’t work, I then removed the message command but still, the error persisted.

Let me try and use a compiler and see if it will work.

Any compiler that you would recommend that would definitely work?

Thanks for the assistance, much appreciated.
Morice is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 6, 2020, 04:42
Default Compiler
  #6
Senior Member
 
vinerm's Avatar
 
Vinerm
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Nederland
Posts: 2,946
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 35
vinerm will become famous soon enough
If you are using Linux, then gcc is already installed. Just compile and it will work. If you use Windows, then you have to install Visual Studio or MS Build Tools with C++ compiler.
__________________
Regards,
Vinerm

PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority.
vinerm is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 6, 2020, 05:56
Default
  #7
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 35
Rep Power: 6
Morice is on a distinguished road
Evening,

Just finished installing Visual Studio.

Will have to see if it works

Thanks for the response, much appreciated
Morice is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 7, 2020, 00:05
Default Floating Point Exception Error
  #8
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 35
Rep Power: 6
Morice is on a distinguished road
Morning Vinerm,

Hope you are well.

I ran into this problem during the simulation.

What could possibly cause this issue?

I have read in other forums that it may be a mesh issue, but this is the same mesh I have been using for my almost 50 simulations now.

Thanks for your assistance, much appreciated
Attached Images
File Type: jpg floating point error.jpg (123.0 KB, 26 views)
File Type: jpg Temp. limited to 1 error.jpg (139.8 KB, 22 views)
Morice is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 8, 2020, 00:13
Default Solution Found
  #9
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 35
Rep Power: 6
Morice is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Morice View Post
Morning Vinerm,

Hope you are well.

I ran into this problem during the simulation.

What could possibly cause this issue?

I have read in other forums that it may be a mesh issue, but this is the same mesh I have been using for my almost 50 simulations now.

Thanks for your assistance, much appreciated
Running the simulation on ANSYS 15 sorted the issue.

Thank you.
Morice is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
incident solar radiation


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Modelling solar and thermal radiation in CSP solar receiver Gioacchino La Rochelle CFX 1 November 15, 2018 07:52
Fluent Radiation/porous media Schmitt pierre-Louis FLUENT 26 September 1, 2016 10:29
Error - Solar absorber - Solar Thermal Radiation MichaelK CFX 12 September 1, 2016 05:15
Monte Carlo Simulation: H-Energy is not convergating & high Incident Radiation volleyHC CFX 5 April 3, 2016 05:41
Fluent incident radiation problem Michael Schwarz Main CFD Forum 0 October 21, 1999 05:56


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:55.