|
[Sponsors] |
February 7, 2002, 12:27 |
Gambit Mesh quality
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I would like to know, for the meshing quality and using the meshing quality tool provided by gambit, which of all those are the most important : area, aspect ratio, edge ratio, equiangle skew, equiangle size, volume. For example, when you control the mesh quality, is it more important to have a good area than a good equiangle skew.
And moreover at which point we can stop to improve our mesh, when we are in "excellent" cf table mesh quality or do we have to improve the mesh untilto be high quality (<0.1) Thank you so much, looking forward any answer, TOM |
|
February 8, 2002, 08:00 |
Re: Gambit Mesh quality
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
The most important as I see it for 2D at least is equiangle skew and aspect ratio. Your equiangle skew should be no more than 0.5, but in fact if say you are modelling a boundary layer then make the angle very low, close to 0.1, in other areas it is less important. The aspect ratio again taking the example of the boundary layer try to make the aspect ratio in the boundary layer very low, and out side where the flow is less important it can be higher up to a certain value.
Cheers Andy |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
3-d mesh gambit (cylinder within a cylinder) | Jason | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 29 | October 30, 2015 09:59 |
[GAMBIT] Mesh Quality in Gambit using Pro E Imports!! | Andrew Fsadni | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 0 | May 25, 2009 16:07 |
mesh quality and independency..!?? | michelle | CFX | 0 | October 15, 2007 06:50 |
Icemcfd 11: Loss of mesh from surface mesh option? | Joe | CFX | 2 | March 26, 2007 19:10 |
3-D Mesh Check in Gambit..... | SHR | FLUENT | 4 | March 25, 2003 04:10 |