# In-cylinder application

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 February 6, 2005, 01:14 In-cylinder application #1 Yogesh Guest   Posts: n/a Sponsored Links Hi, While doing In-cylinder application, I came across with some interesting findings. I am tring to simulate ideal compression process in 3D cylinder. After defining all In-cylinder parameters and zones details; I have solved the same case study with two different approach. In first one I gave the numebr of substeps in each timestep equal to 10 and in another one I gave 40. In both the cases, I found that the difference in maximum temperature is around 120 K ! which is amazing. Above this in both the cases the maximum temperature achieved after compression is not matching with the value that calculted using analytical formula. My question is how to select the number of substeps which will give the approproate results for in-cylinder application? Has any body come across such situation? Can any one share his/her thoughts on this. Regards, Yogesh

 February 6, 2005, 01:37 Re: In-cylinder application #2 Samir Guest   Posts: n/a number of time steps varies inversely to the time step size as far as i can recall doing an unsteady flow. The time step size is more significant a parameter than number of time steps. You would want to control the time step size and then calculate the number of time steps. There is a threshold value that you can calculate for a time step size using any of the CFD books available.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post hsieh OpenFOAM 9 August 16, 2015 14:53 goodegg Main CFD Forum 12 January 22, 2013 12:47 ozzythewise Main CFD Forum 8 June 13, 2012 06:24 blaise OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 0 May 10, 2010 03:56 Mirek Kabacinski FLUENT 0 July 23, 2003 18:40