|
[Sponsors] |
Weak parallel efficiency of TR3990X-based workstation with Star-CCM+ |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
April 12, 2021, 06:01 |
Weak parallel efficiency of TR3990X-based workstation with Star-CCM+
|
#1 |
New Member
Georg
Join Date: Dec 2020
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 6 |
Hello all,
I recently ran some benchmark tests with Star-CCM+ on my departments workstation and noticed that the parallel efficiency scales painfully bad with the number of cores (see the attached specifications and benchmark results). I have read in other posts that the Threadripper lineup is not ideal for CFD-purposes due to the relatively small number of available memory lanes (4). Does this however explain why the parallel efficiency drops to as little as 65% with 8 cores already? I would really appreciate any suggestions on how to find and possibly fix the bottle-neck in the set-up. Best regards! Attachments: - Screenshot of representative benchmark test with Star-CCM+ - Workstation specifications CPU: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X 64-Core Processor mem: Corsair Vengeance LPX, DDR4-3200, CL16 - 64 GB Dual Kit (128GB total) graphics: Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1660 Ti OC 6G, 6144MB GDDR6 SSD: Gigabyte Aorus NVMe SSD, PCIe 4.0 M.2 Type 2280 |
|
Tags |
parallel efficiency, performance benchmark, star ccm+, tr3990x |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Abysmal performance of 64 cores opteron based workstation for CFD | Fauster | Hardware | 8 | June 4, 2018 10:51 |
Problem with Application based on a faceZone in parallel | psilkeit | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 2 | April 28, 2016 09:47 |
OpenFOAM with Inifiband & parallel efficiency | LijieNPIC | OpenFOAM | 15 | June 23, 2011 05:10 |
star cd 4.06 parallel problem | whitemelon | Siemens | 3 | October 23, 2008 14:42 |
Parallel STAR version | Michael Schmid | Siemens | 1 | November 7, 2001 09:41 |