|
[Sponsors] |
November 25, 2005, 15:06 |
why this boundary condition works?
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I have read ijn cfx manual that when we apply mass flow or velocity at inlet and pressure at outlet then it will more robust.but when we apply pressure at inlet and velocity at outlet it will diverge the solution.The later is applicable only to compressible flow.Can anybody tell me why this is happening? the outlet mass flow is applicable to fully developed flow.so what is fully developed flow? and why it is robust for outer mass flow? Thanx
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
November 26, 2005, 14:22 |
Re: why this boundary condition works?
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
The second volume of Hirsh's book has an excellent chapter on boundary conditions for compressible flows. It contains the answer to your question.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
External Radiation Boundary Condition (Two sided wall), Grid Interface | CFD XUE | FLUENT | 0 | July 8, 2010 06:49 |
vorticity boundary condition | bearcharge | Main CFD Forum | 0 | May 14, 2010 11:32 |
Slip boundary condition what is inside | normunds | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | June 4, 2007 06:45 |
Rotating interpolated boundary condition | hani | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | July 4, 2006 07:09 |
Spectral Method Boundary condition | Deepak | Main CFD Forum | 1 | February 25, 2004 09:48 |