# Finite Element vs. Finite Volume Codes

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 December 22, 2005, 13:53 Finite Element vs. Finite Volume Codes #1 Salman Guest   Posts: n/a Sponsored Links Can anybody explain to me the difference between finite element and finite volume CFD codes? Which one is preferable for what type of problems? Thanks.

 December 22, 2005, 13:56 Re: Finite Element vs. Finite Volume Codes #2 tiger Guest   Posts: n/a Most CFD people use the finite volume because of it's stability over the finite element.

 December 22, 2005, 21:19 Re: Finite Element vs. Finite Volume Codes #3 diaw Guest   Posts: n/a I have found that the FEM showcases the underlying physics in a superior way to FVM, which tends to, by its cell-averaging design, damp certain physical phenomena. The nodal interconnectivity of FEM gives useful inter-node information. I understand that there is information in the Wiki on the FVM - FEM comparison. diaw...

 December 26, 2005, 21:07 Re: Finite Element vs. Finite Volume Codes #4 zxaar Guest   Posts: n/a on Wiki on the FVM - FEM comparison is still not written, i wished to add but i do not understant much of FEM, so left it for people who excel in FEM.

 December 29, 2005, 02:45 Re: Finite Element vs. Finite Volume Codes #5 Hubert Janocha Guest   Posts: n/a FEM is normaly apllied to structurall analysis, because the code calculates a length expansion, and out of this it calculates the stress as the first derivation of the length. To be able to do this the FEM-Cell must have at least a linear weight function, which means there are two points discribing a line (e.g. in 3D 8 nodes per hexaeder-cell). The fist derivation of it is a constant function. When you have for e.g. a 1D problem, you would get a piecewise (per dx-interval) constant stairways shape of the stress, which is not really accurate. So you better choose a quadratic weight function (means in 1D there are 3 points defining a quadratic funtion), to get a linear stress in the dx-intervall. For a first shot many peaple using the linear cells in combination with a higher mesh resolution. In CFD there is no need to calculate a first derivation of a value. Because of this a constant weight function is sufficient (FV-Methode, only 1 node per cell). You can increase the result accuracy by using FE-Methods, but is has a great overhead, which let dramatically decrease the speed of the solution progress. To manage at least 8 nodes per cell (linear wight function) instead of only 1 node per cell leads to a extrem memory requirement. Conclusion: In Structural analysis you don't have a choice, you have to use at least a linear cell, because of the first derivation of the length. But in CFD, (especially for large meshes and in transient calculations) FEM-Methods are not really practicable, in these days (!). By the way; when using more and smaller cells in general, the needed geometrical accuracy given by the modell-walls (especially in CFD) is much higher. Hope this helps Hubert Janocha

 January 2, 2006, 20:14 Re: Finite Element vs. Finite Volume Codes #6 Salman Guest   Posts: n/a Thanks for all your replies. Some CFD packages that use FEM approach, present it as part of the natural evolution of things. Now I have a better idea.

 January 3, 2006, 10:26 Re: Finite Element vs. Finite Volume Codes #7 diaw Guest   Posts: n/a For fluids, FEM will provide intricate flow details that FVM would be hard-pressed to do. The interconnectivity between nodes is precisely why FEM does such a good job. I think of FVM as a glorified form of FDM - a net of point samplings taken over the flow domain. diaw...

 January 3, 2006, 14:58 Finite elemnent and finite volume #8 S. Dhinakaran Guest   Posts: n/a Finite volume codes are easy to write. Writing a finite element code is laborious and it takes much time.

 January 6, 2006, 05:19 Re: Finite elemnent and finite volume #9 Alex Muthaiah Guest   Posts: n/a 1)Finite Element basically works on Weighted residual method and Finite Volume works bascially on Conservation priniciples. 2)In FEM nodal connectivity is important to get solution if u r not able to make so it will take as freeedge in solution domain. But in FVM nodal connectivity is not mandatory but face connectivity is must since flux b/t cell face has to conserve. ciyo Alex Fresh likes this.

 January 6, 2006, 23:59 Re: Finite elemnent and finite volume #10 diaw Guest   Posts: n/a >>>1)Finite Element basically works on Weighted residual method and Finite Volume works bascially on Conservation priniciples. -------- FVM is also a Weighted Residual method... with constant weighting (ref Patankar - p30) diaw...

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post solomon FLUENT 4 April 3, 2015 00:10 Ganesh FLUENT 13 January 22, 2014 05:11 AlmostSurelyRob OpenFOAM 3 June 24, 2011 13:06 tool Main CFD Forum 0 October 9, 2008 10:07 C-H Kuo Main CFD Forum 3 November 5, 1998 10:07