|
[Sponsors] |
Error with higher order (2nd, GAMMA) upwind scheme |
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
TWB
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 418
Rep Power: 20 ![]() |
Hi,
I changed my solver from central to 1st order upwind scheme and it works fine when my cylinder is stationary. When I tried using higher order schemes, such as 2nd order upwind or GAMMA, I get divergence and erroneous results. I 've some questions when using higher order upwind scheme: 1. do i have to use higher resolution to ensure stability/accuracy? 2. are these schemes stable/accurate at low Re e.g. 100? 3. do i have to use smaller time step? i tried to change the resolution and Re but there's still problems. Hope someone can help. Tks. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
First Order to Higher Order Blending Factor | NormalVector | FLUENT | 4 | November 13, 2023 07:06 |
applying 2nd order muscl scheme to 2D unstructured(triangle) grid | dokeun | Main CFD Forum | 2 | May 22, 2012 02:42 |
Differences between serial and parallel runs | carsten | OpenFOAM Bugs | 11 | September 12, 2008 11:16 |
Higher order downwind scheme | jelmer | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 4 | August 9, 2006 06:43 |
second order FD upwind scheme | Heinz Wilkening | Main CFD Forum | 2 | November 3, 1998 14:33 |