|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
New Member
Michael Smith
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Canberra, Australia
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 13 ![]() |
I want to create a multi-body part so the two bodies are meshed together in Ansys Meshing. You can do this in DesignModeller by 'creating a new part', however doing the new component in SpaceClaim doesn't seem to have the same effect.
This is all so I can use a momentum source in CFX-Pre without having to create an interface between the two bodies. Thanks! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
New Member
Michael Smith
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Canberra, Australia
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 13 ![]() |
Ok let me try this from another angle.
Does anyone know how to make Ansys Meshing mesh two bodies as one part, ensuring mesh continuation between bodies negating the need for an interface in CFX-pre? I would have thought such a control would be possible in Ansys Meshing (ie, not at the geometry stage). |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Ruud Caljouw
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 45
Rep Power: 14 ![]() |
Hi,
Did you find an answer to this. i am encountering the same problem Thanks |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
thomas
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 50
Rep Power: 12 ![]() |
Hello,
did anyone find a way to get passed this problem? I tried changing the "share topology" under "analysis" when clicking on the extracted volume, but with no success. Any ideas? Regards. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Ruud Caljouw
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 45
Rep Power: 14 ![]() |
If you have a component with multiple bodies in Spaclaim you have different share topology options in the bottom left menu: none, group, share and merge.
If you select share the meshes will match in ansys meshing. A quick online search can provide more details on this. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
thomas
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 50
Rep Power: 12 ![]() |
Hello,
thank you for your reply. I solved the problem. As I already wrote, I already tried the topology options with no success. The problem was, that my geometry still had a few CAD-issues. I repaired them all with the "Repair" tools from SpaceClaim. Best regards, Thomas |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
meshing, multi-body, spaceclaim |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[DesignModeler] How to create fluid body as I first designed the solid part through solid works? | rasekh64 | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 9 | May 13, 2013 13:15 |
replacing of shock tube high pressure part with a boundary condition for low pressure | immortality | Main CFD Forum | 0 | May 2, 2013 13:30 |
what boundary condition is proper for simulation of shock-tube low pressure part? | immortality | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | May 2, 2013 13:22 |
Extracting fluid flow region from a solid body 3D | Pradeep | Main CFD Forum | 6 | January 29, 2009 11:13 |
Coke Bottle | ram | Main CFD Forum | 13 | September 29, 2000 04:17 |