|
[Sponsors] |
June 8, 2017, 13:05 |
|
#21 | |
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,771
Rep Power: 71 |
Quote:
I have no other idea than "try and test" ... |
||
June 8, 2017, 13:10 |
|
#22 | |
Senior Member
dilaw meda
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: algeria
Posts: 145
Rep Power: 8 |
Quote:
|
||
June 9, 2017, 03:27 |
|
#23 | |
Senior Member
Blanco
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Torino, Italy
Posts: 193
Rep Power: 17 |
Quote:
Considering this, I would suggest to reduce your computational domain: the nozzle you're investigating has a cylindrical shape in the initial part and it seems that a steady flowfield is achieved in it, as long as your measurements are concerned (some diameter after the hair dryer-nozzle junction the exp. velocity is not chaning anymore). I suggest you to cut your computational domain and put the new inlet boundary in the same position where you experimentally observe that the flow velocity within the nozzle is not changin anymore, and then impose the same velocity on the computational boundary (3.15 m/s). I would assume that the wakes have disappeared/dissipated on the new inlet section, at least the bigger. I agree that an experimental pressure would certainly help to better impose the boundary conditions on your computational domain. You have however to assume turbulent quantities on your inlet boundary, as prof. MFDenaro already wrote, and the best thing you can do to start is assume a fully developed turbulent profile. To verify the impact of this assumption on your CFD3D results, you can re-run your simulation with different inlet turbulent quantities and check how much the results will change (e.g. change turbulence intensity, etc. etc.). |
||
June 9, 2017, 04:00 |
|
#24 |
Senior Member
Blanco
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Torino, Italy
Posts: 193
Rep Power: 17 |
You can also do another thing: add a cylindrical pipe between the blower and the nozzle. The longer the cylindrical pipe the better it is theoretically, but some diameter length will be enough. Then you can measure the velocity profile in the junction between the nozzle and the cylindrical pipe, this way avoiding the wakes coming from the blower. You can measure the velocity in the centerline and near the walls easily there and you don't have any close grid upstream influencing your measurements... If the pipe is long enough, you will have a fully developed turbulent profile in it so you should be able to set turbulent quantities easily in your model (and you don't have to reduce your computational domain).
|
|
June 9, 2017, 04:05 |
|
#25 |
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,771
Rep Power: 71 |
What it is not clear to me (I don't have enough experience in experimental devices) is if this velocity measurement is accurate or not. For turbulent flow it would requires a very accurate device. And the measures must be statistically averaged to be congruent to the RANS simulation...
|
|
June 9, 2017, 22:57 |
|
#26 |
Senior Member
dilaw meda
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: algeria
Posts: 145
Rep Power: 8 |
Thank you for your suggestions, i did listened to it by using the velocity 3.15m/s at the i let wich was almost constant in the cylindre shape of the nozzle, now the new problem is when the jet exits the nozzle the numerical axial velocity at the exit was almost the same like the experimental data ... Fine, after that it keeps going up for few axial stations then it decays , where in the experimental mesurements there is no going up, the velocity decays the moment it exits the nozzle. Could you help me finding why ?
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Issues when simulating nozzle flow with outside region | blais.bruno | SU2 | 4 | March 13, 2024 14:04 |
Convergent-Divergent Nozzle with MATLAB | Obad | Main CFD Forum | 8 | June 2, 2020 14:10 |
Supersonic Nozzle Exhaust Simulation | mikeh | FLUENT | 0 | May 1, 2014 21:28 |
Flow simulation in a Pelton turbine nozzle | fivos | FLUENT | 0 | April 19, 2011 11:46 |
compressible flow in a counterflow nozzle | d.vamsidhar | FLUENT | 0 | November 24, 2005 01:45 |