CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Relation between Wall shear stress and rate of strain tensor

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree5Likes
  • 1 Post By duri
  • 1 Post By duri
  • 1 Post By FMDenaro
  • 1 Post By FMDenaro
  • 1 Post By FMDenaro

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   May 2, 2020, 13:47
Default Relation between Wall shear stress and rate of strain tensor
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 6
samiahmed is on a distinguished road
In cfd-online, we can find that the wall shear stress is defined by:


\tau_w = \mu \left(\frac{\partial u}{\partial y} \right)_{y=0}


But why it depends only on the u and y? AFAIK the rate of strain is a symmetric tensor (has 6 components).



How can one get the expression of the wall shear stress from the rate of strain tensor?


Thank you
samiahmed is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 2, 2020, 14:02
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,771
Rep Power: 71
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by samiahmed View Post
In cfd-online, we can find that the wall shear stress is defined by:


\tau_w = \mu \left(\frac{\partial u}{\partial y} \right)_{y=0}


But why it depends only on the u and y? AFAIK the rate of strain is a symmetric tensor (has 6 components).



How can one get the expression of the wall shear stress from the rate of strain tensor?


Thank you



On a wall the velocity components vanish owing to the no-slip condition, thus write your tensors components on the wall and see ...
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 2, 2020, 14:57
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 6
samiahmed is on a distinguished road
Thank you for your reply, My goal is to get the expression of the wall shear stress from viscous stress tensor (details below), but I am stuck in the final steps. I wonder why the terms: {\partial v\over \partial x}, {\partial u\over \partial x} , and {\partial v\over \partial y}\ vanish at the wall?


Here is what I've done so far:



Let's consider a 2D incompressible laminar flow, of a newtonian fluid;


The viscous stress tensor is given by:


\tau_{ij} = 2\mu D_{ij} \tag{1}


Where D_{ij} is the rate of strain and is given by:


D_{ij} = {1\over 2} \left({\partial u_i\over \partial x_j} + {\partial u_j\over \partial x_i}\right)  \tag{2}


The viscous stress vector at a surface with a normal \mathbf n = (n_1, n_2)^T is given by:


\mathbf T = \mathbf\tau\cdot\mathbf  n

Or:
T_i = \tau_{ij}n_j

In other words:

\begin{pmatrix}
T_1 \\
T_2
\end{pmatrix}
  = \begin{pmatrix}
\tau_{11} & \tau_{12} \\
\tau_{21} & \tau_{22}
\end{pmatrix}
\begin{pmatrix}
  n_1\\
n_2
 \end{pmatrix}
=
\begin{pmatrix}
  \tau_{11}n_1 + \tau_{12}n_2\\
 \tau_{21}n_1 + \tau_{22}n_2
 \end{pmatrix}
=
\begin{pmatrix}
  2\mu{\partial u\over\partial x}n_1 + \mu\left({\partial u\over\partial y} + {\partial v \over\partial x }\right)n_2\\
   \mu\left({\partial u\over\partial y} + {\partial v \over\partial x }\right)n_1+ 2\mu{\partial v\over\partial y}n_2
\end{pmatrix}


Now, I am stuck, How to proceed further to get the wall shear stress expression, could you please help me?
samiahmed is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 2, 2020, 15:45
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
duri
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 245
Rep Power: 16
duri is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by samiahmed View Post

But why it depends only on the u and y? AFAIK the rate of strain is a symmetric tensor (has 6 components).

Yes it depend on all the strain components and it is quite difficult to derive than to calculate a generic formula. The formula you mentioned is for 2D flow with wall parallel to y-axis. It indicates derivative of resultant tangential velocity normal to the wall.
samiahmed likes this.
duri is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 2, 2020, 15:54
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
duri
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 245
Rep Power: 16
duri is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by samiahmed View Post
Thank you for your reply, My goal is to get the expression of the wall shear stress from viscous stress tensor (details below), but I am stuck in the final steps. I wonder why the terms: {\partial v\over \partial x}, {\partial u\over \partial x} , and {\partial v\over \partial y}\ vanish at the wall?


Here is what I've done so far:



Let's consider a 2D incompressible laminar flow, of a newtonian fluid;


The viscous stress tensor is given by:


\tau_{ij} = 2\mu D_{ij} \tag{1}


Where D_{ij} is the rate of strain and is given by:


D_{ij} = {1\over 2} \left({\partial u_i\over \partial x_j} + {\partial u_j\over \partial x_i}\right)  \tag{2}


The viscous stress vector at a surface with a normal \mathbf n = (n_1, n_2)^T is given by:


\mathbf T = \mathbf\tau\cdot\mathbf  n

Or:
T_i = \tau_{ij}n_j

In other words:

\begin{pmatrix}
T_1 \\
T_2
\end{pmatrix}
  = \begin{pmatrix}
\tau_{11} & \tau_{12} \\
\tau_{21} & \tau_{22}
\end{pmatrix}
\begin{pmatrix}
  n_1\\
n_2
 \end{pmatrix}
=
\begin{pmatrix}
  \tau_{11}n_1 + \tau_{12}n_2\\
 \tau_{21}n_1 + \tau_{22}n_2
 \end{pmatrix}
=
\begin{pmatrix}
  2\mu{\partial u\over\partial x}n_1 + \mu\left({\partial u\over\partial y} + {\partial v \over\partial x }\right)n_2\\
   \mu\left({\partial u\over\partial y} + {\partial v \over\partial x }\right)n_1+ 2\mu{\partial v\over\partial y}n_2
\end{pmatrix}


Now, I am stuck, How to proceed further to get the wall shear stress expression, could you please help me?

Once you got force components take only the tangential force which acts on the wall. Derivation of this is difficult for generic wall orientation in 3D. For 2D it is Fx*ny - Fy*nx. Also apply u.n=0 (wall normal velocity is zero).
samiahmed likes this.
duri is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 2, 2020, 16:03
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,771
Rep Power: 71
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
For incompressible 2d flows you have the divergence-free constraint that, written on the wall reduces to dv/dy=0
samiahmed likes this.
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 2, 2020, 16:25
Default
  #7
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 6
samiahmed is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by FMDenaro View Post
For incompressible 2d flows you have the divergence-free constraint that, written on the wall reduces to dv/dy=0

Why is that true? how can I get that result? because I guess you are assuming {\partial u\over\partial x}\vert_{\text{wall}} = 0 but why?
samiahmed is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 2, 2020, 16:31
Default
  #8
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,771
Rep Power: 71
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by samiahmed View Post
Why is that true? how can I get that result? because I guess you are assuming {\partial u\over\partial x}\vert_{\text{wall}} = 0 but why?

because you assume that x is the direction of the wall and the tangential velocity component is zero everywhere along it
samiahmed likes this.
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 2, 2020, 16:46
Default
  #9
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 6
samiahmed is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by FMDenaro View Post
because you assume that x is the direction of the wall and the tangential velocity component is zero everywhere along it

But that's not necessarily true for a general curved wall (e.g airfoil).
samiahmed is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 2, 2020, 16:48
Default
  #10
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,771
Rep Power: 71
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by samiahmed View Post
But that's not necessarily true for a general curved wall (e.g airfoil).

it is still true if you write the expression in curvilinear coordinates, i.e., normal and tangential directions
samiahmed likes this.
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 2, 2020, 17:19
Default
  #11
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 6
samiahmed is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by FMDenaro View Post
it is still true if you write the expression in curvilinear coordinates, i.e., normal and tangential directions
Thank you. Now, I think it makes sense:
since we chose to write the equations in curvilinear coordinates, we have:


\mathbf n \equiv \mathbf j \implies (n_1, n_2)^T \equiv (0, 1)^T
hence:


T_w  = 
 \begin{pmatrix}
\mu\left({\partial u\over\partial y}\right)_w \\ 
0
\end{pmatrix}


And since the wall shear stress is the tangential component of the viscous stress vector at the wall, we get:


\tau_w = \mu\left({\partial u\over\partial y}\right)_w
samiahmed is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Natural convection in a closed domain STILL NEEDING help! Yr0gErG FLUENT 4 December 2, 2019 00:04
shear rate and strain rate Lilly FLUENT 1 August 29, 2014 00:46
What is wall shear stress and shear strain rate? warlocklw Main CFD Forum 2 May 21, 2012 06:16
UDF for wall slipping HFLUENT Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming 0 April 27, 2011 12:03
What is the detail definition of wall shear stress zjm FLUENT 0 January 2, 2002 07:43


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 21:27.