|
[Sponsors] |
September 24, 2020, 09:40 |
RNG k-e model
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Gerry Kan
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 348
Rep Power: 10 |
Howdy People:
Many source claimed that the RNG model producing better results when compared against measurement data. However, I came across the following passage from Pope's book on Turbulence (1997 edition, page 383): "In the RNG k-e model there is also an additional term in the e equation, which is and ad hoc model, not derived from RNG theory. It is this term which is largely responsible for the difference in performance of the standard and RNG models." My personal experience with RNG has been inconclusive. I am wondering if you have a different observation than what Pope and your truly had. Thanks, Gerry. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Which model can I use instead of RNG k-E and get good pressures? | danijela.djuric.mijovic | CFX | 5 | June 21, 2014 06:04 |
Water subcooled boiling | Attesz | CFX | 7 | January 5, 2013 03:32 |
How to use K-ε RNG turbulence model | AirWolf | STAR-CCM+ | 4 | October 20, 2009 06:23 |
rng model &standard k-e model | frank | FLUENT | 0 | December 26, 2005 01:38 |
RNG k-epsilon model | Pilli | Main CFD Forum | 1 | December 12, 2000 14:15 |