CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Trailing edge separation pocket: physical or numerical?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   February 27, 2021, 16:28
Default Trailing edge separation pocket: physical or numerical?
  #1
New Member
 
Marco Caboni
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
MarcoCaboni is on a distinguished road
Hi all,

Recently, I have been performing steady state, incompressible simulations using the k-omega SST RANS turbulence model on a wind turbine blade. For this blade, I have generated 2 grids which use the same number of chordwise points, but one of them uses 3-time larger number of spanwise points (see screenshot). The simulation done using the finer mesh exhibits a large trailing edge separation pocket (see screenshot) in a region where we wouldn’t normally expect separation to occur (very low AoA and no sudden variations of the blade’s planform). I have also noticed several much smaller pockets occurring in the finer mesh over the whole training edge of the blade. Using the coarser mesh most of the separation pockets (including the large one) disappear.

For the finer mesh, average residuals look fine, and field residuals do not indicate any grid-related issues around the pocket region. Also, the flow field around the pocket does not look abnormal. This is puzzling as I cannot conclude whether these pockets are physical (captured by a finer mesh) or just numerical artifacts.

Have you ever experienced anything similar? Or can you suggest possible tests or references to shed some light on the issue?

Many thanks!

Last edited by MarcoCaboni; March 11, 2021 at 13:59.
MarcoCaboni is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 1, 2021, 03:43
Default Refinement chordwise
  #2
New Member
 
lucas s
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Grenoble, France
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 11
LoUcAsss is on a distinguished road
Hi,


Coarser mesh leads to higher numerical dissipation. So it is not surprising to observe separation as the mesh is finer.
However in your case, I would have expected to observe that while increasing the number of nodes chordwise. It is true that the separation is 3D and the span direction should have an impact on the separation.
I suggest you study the mesh convergence in all directions. And I think you can find many articles with similar issues on naca profiles.


Cheers,
Lucas
LoUcAsss is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 1, 2021, 04:35
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,146
Rep Power: 66
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
First of all, you should ensure that the residuals of all equations on the finer grid are below a good threshold. Then try to refine further the grid in all directions. Note that to assess the physical meaning of a flow separation you need to have a fine resolution in the BL.
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
fine meshes, rans, separation

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Discontinuity at the blunt trailing edge of an airfoil klkl OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 October 28, 2020 04:42
Trailing edge sensitivity anlaysis JanH SU2 2 November 23, 2018 13:53
Difference between diffusion, dissipation and dispersion in physical and numerical TurbJet Main CFD Forum 9 October 6, 2018 18:15
Meshing near leading and trailing edge of propeller surajp92 STAR-CCM+ 1 June 1, 2017 01:40
[ICEM] Meshing Wing with low Y+ value and sharp trailing edge sonic109 ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 0 July 27, 2015 09:29


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:47.