CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Why does velocity increase unexpectedly in density based solver for compressible flow

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree7Likes
  • 1 Post By shaonme
  • 1 Post By FMDenaro
  • 1 Post By FMDenaro
  • 1 Post By FMDenaro
  • 2 Post By Simbelmynė
  • 1 Post By sbaffini

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   April 13, 2021, 11:10
Default Why does velocity increase unexpectedly in density based solver for compressible flow
  #1
New Member
 
stalukar
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 9
shaonme is on a distinguished road
I am trying to simulate a mixing process of Helium jet in atmospheric air. He is coming out from a tube of 4.6 mm inner dia with a Re number of 2500 where the air is considered stagnant.
To set the model, I use an inlet velocity BC with a velocity of 66.5 m/s for He jet inflow in the domain. I also set a zero pressure outlet BC at a sufficient distance from the inlet to allow enough space for mixing.
The model is in a steady state. To capture the mixing, I use the species transport model available in Fluent. It looks like the model works fine.
However, I found the velocity goes unexpectedly high (~1200 m/s max) in the domain when the solution is converged.
If anyone has any suggestions, it would be highly appreciated.
aerosayan likes this.
shaonme is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 13, 2021, 11:19
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Sayan Bhattacharjee
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 495
Rep Power: 8
aerosayan is on a distinguished road
Wouldn't the zero pressure outlet cause the air in the duct to accelerate out?
The setup seems to be basically a rocket exhaust nozzle in space vacuum.


High exhaust velocity makes sense for such a rocket nozzle. Though, I'm not sure about 1200 m/s.

Am I misunderstanding something?

Last edited by aerosayan; April 13, 2021 at 11:21. Reason: fix
aerosayan is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 13, 2021, 11:27
Default
  #3
New Member
 
stalukar
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 9
shaonme is on a distinguished road
aerosayan,

Thanks for your reply.

Zero Pressure outlet: that's a valid point.

Though the velocity profile looks like rocket propulsion, the physics of my case is simple - helium is coming from a tube like a jet and being mixed into the air.

To my understanding, the velocity at the outlet should be much smaller than the inlet velocity as the flow decelerates as it gets diffused to air.

In that case, could you please suggest any other BC type for the outlet?
shaonme is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 13, 2021, 11:37
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,777
Rep Power: 71
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
If I understand, the model is for full compressible flows, isn't it?
With such a high velocity the flow is supersonic and the outlet condition does not enter in the computation


What about the other inflow conditions? Being subsonic you need to fix all but one boundary condition. Have you verified the other variable?
aero_head likes this.
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 13, 2021, 11:45
Default
  #5
New Member
 
stalukar
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 9
shaonme is on a distinguished road
the model is for full compressible flows, isn't it?
Yes
The inlet velocity is only 66.5 m/s (M ~ 0.2), and I am not sure why it is becoming supersonic as it moves forward.
I am not sure if the inflow condition is the crucial factor.

Have you verified the other variable?
I am not sure what you meant.

I made sure the model setup was okay except the BCs as the results are not expected.
shaonme is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 13, 2021, 12:03
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,777
Rep Power: 71
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by shaonme View Post
the model is for full compressible flows, isn't it?
Yes
The inlet velocity is only 66.5 m/s (M ~ 0.2), and I am not sure why it is becoming supersonic as it moves forward.
I am not sure if the inflow condition is the crucial factor.

Have you verified the other variable?
I am not sure what you meant.

I made sure the model setup was okay except the BCs as the results are not expected.



First of all, your simulation should be unsteady in a deterministic sense, thus are you using a RANS formulation?



In compressible flows you need to prescribe the inlet condition for the full set of equations, that is density, momentum and energy. For subsonic flows you have to let a condition coming from the interior, you cannot prescribe all conditions in terms of Dirichlet. Hence, what about the prescription of the other variables?
aero_head likes this.
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 13, 2021, 12:10
Default
  #7
New Member
 
stalukar
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 9
shaonme is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by FMDenaro View Post
First of all, your simulation should be unsteady in a deterministic sense, thus are you using a RANS formulation?

Yes, I used k-epsilon model.



In compressible flows you need to prescribe the inlet condition for the full set of equations, that is density, momentum and energy. For subsonic flows you have to let a condition coming from the interior, you cannot prescribe all conditions in terms of Dirichlet. Hence, what about the prescription of the other variables?
In that case, are you suggesting to patch values for other variables like pressure, temperature to the interior? This is what you meant.
If you could write a bit detail, it would be really helpful for me.
shaonme is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 13, 2021, 12:33
Default
  #8
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,777
Rep Power: 71
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by shaonme View Post
In that case, are you suggesting to patch values for other variables like pressure, temperature to the interior? This is what you meant.
If you could write a bit detail, it would be really helpful for me.

You need to know the theory of the chararacteristic for hyperbolic equations.

As example, consider a 2D case, you have to consider the conditions for 4 variables at the inlet, that is density, x-velocity, y-velocity, total energy. For subsonic flow the characteristic line related to the eigenvalue u-a will come from the interior towards the inlet section. Therefore you have to set one variable free to come from the interior.

Have a look to the theory in some textbook.
aero_head likes this.
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 14, 2021, 02:11
Default
  #9
Senior Member
 
Arjun
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Nurenberg, Germany
Posts: 1,274
Rep Power: 34
arjun will become famous soon enougharjun will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by shaonme View Post
I am trying to simulate a mixing process of Helium jet in atmospheric air. He is coming out from a tube of 4.6 mm inner dia with a Re number of 2500 where the air is considered stagnant.
To set the model, I use an inlet velocity BC with a velocity of 66.5 m/s for He jet inflow in the domain. I also set a zero pressure outlet BC at a sufficient distance from the inlet to allow enough space for mixing.
The model is in a steady state. To capture the mixing, I use the species transport model available in Fluent. It looks like the model works fine.
However, I found the velocity goes unexpectedly high (~1200 m/s max) in the domain when the solution is converged.
If anyone has any suggestions, it would be highly appreciated.

Are you using pressure based solver or density based solver?
arjun is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 14, 2021, 11:18
Default
  #10
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,777
Rep Power: 71
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by arjun View Post
Are you using pressure based solver or density based solver?



The title of the post is about density based solver ...
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 15, 2021, 01:18
Default
  #11
Senior Member
 
Arjun
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Nurenberg, Germany
Posts: 1,274
Rep Power: 34
arjun will become famous soon enougharjun will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by FMDenaro View Post
The title of the post is about density based solver ...
Ohh thank you. I did not carefully read the title.


I recently implemented two phase comparessible flow model and did some similar calculations like injecting a gas etc and I did not observe this type of behaviour. But I did see this type of behaviour with pressure based solver.

So i find it bit strange the density based solver shows this.
arjun is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 15, 2021, 02:57
Default
  #12
Senior Member
 
Simbelmynė's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 548
Rep Power: 15
Simbelmynė is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by shaonme View Post
I am trying to simulate a mixing process of Helium jet in atmospheric air. He is coming out from a tube of 4.6 mm inner dia with a Re number of 2500 where the air is considered stagnant.
To set the model, I use an inlet velocity BC with a velocity of 66.5 m/s for He jet inflow in the domain. I also set a zero pressure outlet BC at a sufficient distance from the inlet to allow enough space for mixing.
The model is in a steady state. To capture the mixing, I use the species transport model available in Fluent. It looks like the model works fine.
However, I found the velocity goes unexpectedly high (~1200 m/s max) in the domain when the solution is converged.
If anyone has any suggestions, it would be highly appreciated.

I would not use an inlet velocity boundary condition. Pressure inlet or mass flow inlet should be the proper one.
sbaffini and FMDenaro like this.
Simbelmynė is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 15, 2021, 04:18
Default
  #13
Senior Member
 
sbaffini's Avatar
 
Paolo Lampitella
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Italy
Posts: 2,152
Blog Entries: 29
Rep Power: 39
sbaffini will become famous soon enoughsbaffini will become famous soon enough
Send a message via Skype™ to sbaffini
Could you give more details on the relevant settings? 2D/3D/AXI? What are all the material settings? All the other boundary conditions? Maybe a sketch of the mesh/domain? Convective scheme? Gradient? Turbulent or laminar?

Also, to which extent is this high speed region relevant? Does it seem as a physical result of the used boundary conditions or some numerical artifact? Maybe a picture would help as well.

Finally, qualify converged results.
el_mojito likes this.
sbaffini is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Issues on the simulation of high-speed compressible flow within turbomachinery dowlee OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 11 August 6, 2021 06:40
Pressure based and Density based Solver Xobile Main CFD Forum 39 August 19, 2020 06:04
New solver with temperature-dependent density based on simpleFoam? fanta OpenFOAM Programming & Development 0 December 5, 2017 03:40
Pressure based and Density based Solver taekyu8 FLUENT 0 January 28, 2013 11:05
Density based solver with cnst density! p_agoodboy FLUENT 0 November 8, 2010 22:18


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:03.