|
[Sponsors] |
Wind turbine single blade, extra MRF zone required? |
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 98
Rep Power: 13 ![]() |
Hello,
I am facing the simulation of a wind turbine blade. Single blade with 120° rotational periodic domain. I have seen 2 ways of simulating it: -On the first one, a MRF zone has been set around the blade that is connected to the bigger domain (no MRF) with an interface. -On the other case, a single big domain has been done, all set as MRF. Which one would be the correct approach and why? I see the advantage of having no interface, but I am not sure whether setting the whole domain as MRF can have some drawback. Thank you very much in advance. Kind regards. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
meshing 3d, meshing advice, wind turbine |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AutoGrid - Meshing wind turbine blade | Ko_Shine | Fidelity CFD | 6 | November 7, 2024 12:47 |
Wind turbine blade gradient-based constrained optimisation | JanFoam | SU2 | 2 | January 19, 2021 08:40 |
[BladeModeler] Geometry and Meshing for Failure Analysis of Wind turbine blade | Wajeeh | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 0 | December 30, 2020 05:17 |
Problem in conducting CFD of analysis of wind turbine blade | atulpat | CFX | 16 | August 17, 2013 04:09 |
[Other] ANSYS CFX-Meshing problem of a wind turbine blade | Zoe | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 1 | July 14, 2010 02:02 |