|
[Sponsors] |
November 8, 2001, 14:30 |
Boundary Layer created by Euler Solvers
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi, I have a simple question: Can you completely eliminate boundary layers created by Euler solvers? (of course, on a grid of a reasonable size. not h->0)
I computed a low-speed subsonic flow over a small bump on a structured nearly uniform quadrilateral grid by a 2nd order MUSCL-type finite-volume Euler solver with Roe's flux formula, with pressure extrapolation on the solid boundary (flux=[0,p*n,0] on the wall). In the solution, I see a boundary layer behind the bump, i.e. the x-velocity decreases towards the bottom wall (not goes to zero, though); all other variables look symmetric wrt the bump. Well, is it a nature of Euler solvers? I want to know whether this is just a limitation or a bug. Thanks, Jim |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How to set boundary layer of a moving body in GAMBIT to a mesh zone for dynamic mesh | tomyangbath | FLUENT | 18 | October 12, 2016 06:57 |
[Gmsh] Import problem | ARC | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 0 | February 27, 2010 10:56 |
To thin boundary layer? | Luk | CFX | 3 | February 27, 2009 03:22 |
[Commercial meshers] Trimmed cell and embedded refinement mesh conversion issues | michele | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | July 15, 2005 04:15 |
Boundary Layer Flow Paradox | Wen Long | Main CFD Forum | 3 | September 24, 2002 08:47 |