|
[Sponsors] |
January 18, 1999, 15:06 |
CFD 2000
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Has anyone used this software from Adaptive Research? Can anyone give me a feedback? Thank you.
|
|
January 22, 1999, 16:13 |
Re: CFD 2000
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi Yes I have just started to use the software and I would say that the user interface is very easy to get into and use .
It took me about 2 hours to get startd. Although I have been using CFD both my owm code an commercial cfd code for 4 years now. It is however limited to the k-eps turbulence model. sofar And is uses PISO to solve the velocity pressure coubling. Best Regards jens |
|
January 27, 1999, 08:22 |
Re: CFD 2000
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thank you for the response.
YP |
|
February 6, 1999, 01:51 |
Re: CFD 2000
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Someone has it at my work. Compared to some of the other CFD codes at work, CFD2000 is quite easy to use. The interface is neat and not "heavy" like some of the other CFD codes. On the down side, it does lack in physical modeling capabilitities.
Evan |
|
February 8, 1999, 08:13 |
Re: CFD 2000
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thank you for your response.
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CFD Wiki - We Need More Help | Jonas Larsson | Main CFD Forum | 13 | September 13, 2005 17:36 |
PC vs. Workstation | Tim Franke | Main CFD Forum | 5 | September 29, 1999 15:01 |
Since Last June | John C. Chien | Main CFD Forum | 3 | July 12, 1999 09:38 |
Which is better to develop in-house CFD code or to buy a available CFD package. | Tareq Al-shaalan | Main CFD Forum | 10 | June 12, 1999 23:27 |
CFD Symposium (Call for Papers) | Chris R. Kleijn | Main CFD Forum | 0 | October 5, 1998 10:25 |