Cell-vertex and cell-centered finite volume method

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 September 6, 2003, 08:18 Cell-vertex and cell-centered finite volume method #1 Praveen Guest   Posts: n/a If you have a triangular unstructured grid with Nv vertices and Nt triangles then Nv:Nt = 1:2 approximately. With a cell-vertex scheme the unknowns are stored at the vertices and with cell-centered they are stored at cell centres. So there are twice the number of degrees of freedom with cell-centered than in cell-vertex scheme. So how come both methods will give roughly the same accuracy on a grid which is more or less uniform (ie not highly anisotropic. In this case the accuracy of cell-centered scheme degrades.). Any references on this would be appreciated.

 September 7, 2003, 23:51 Re: Cell-vertex and cell-centered finite volume me #2 QKim Guest   Posts: n/a Praveen: I'm also very interested in reading more on this issue. The 1:2 ratio is right, but, I'm wondering if they give the (more or less) same accuracy. One of Dr. Venkatakrishnan's ICASE reports discusses the accuracy associated with CC and CV method. I think the report points out that the volume (area) of a cell in CC method is generally smaller than the cell area in CV method. The ICASE report cited an AIAA paper by Dr. Frink. I will post the more details if you need them. The number of flux computations required per a control volume is generally larger in CV method than in CC method. On the other hand, the ratio between the number of cells is 1:2 as you pointed out. So, as for the cost (excluding memory), I'm not sure that CC method is much more expensive than CV method as I had been thinking.

 September 8, 2003, 02:08 Re: Cell-vertex and cell-centered finite volume me #3 Praveen Guest   Posts: n/a I would like more details/references, thank you. I feel that the accuracy is determined by the accuracy of the flux integral. And the number of flux computations is same in CC and CV (assuming a centered-dual cell in CV). There are less number of faces per/cell in CC but more cells while there are more faces per/cell in CV but less number of cells. The number of flux evaluations which is equal to the number of edges is the same in both.

 September 8, 2003, 22:30 Re: Cell-vertex and cell-centered finite volume me #4 QKim Guest   Posts: n/a Here's the link to the report by Dr. Venkatakrishnan: http://techreports.larc.nasa.gov/ica...ase-1995-3.pdf AIAA paper 93-3500 by Dr. Frink, Dr. Pirzadeh and others. If you find more references, would you post them? Thanks.

 September 8, 2003, 23:58 Re: Cell-vertex and cell-centered finite volume me #5 Anthony Iannetti Guest   Posts: n/a Dimitri Mavriplis of ICASE, now at ?, wrote a lot of NASA Langley / ICASE Papers comparing the two methods. I think it is a memory versus computation issue. I forget the specifics. I work with CC codes. For a variety of cell types, CC COULD be easier, because the dual mesh is a little abstract for quad, hexm, etc.. (non simplical) meshes. Tony

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post vishwa OpenFOAM Native Meshers: snappyHexMesh and Others 24 June 27, 2016 08:54 anger OpenFOAM Native Meshers: blockMesh 22 December 15, 2015 03:06 neil Main CFD Forum 1 April 23, 2007 16:54 peter.zhao Main CFD Forum 1 September 15, 2004 09:26 peter.zhao Main CFD Forum 3 November 13, 2002 05:47

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 21:10.