Why to take Normal to a surface... -- CFD Online Discussion Forums

May 11, 2010, 07:26	Why to take Normal to a surface...	#1
Dhileep T K New Member Dhileep Join Date: Apr 2010 Posts: 10 Rep Power: 16	Hi, I have written a Finite volume natural convection code for a square cavity using a structured cartesian grid using "Versteeg Malalasekara" as reference book. Now i am trying to do the same using an unstructured grid using "Blazek" as reference book. Blazek explained to take normal vector for each face. Why to do this. I never encountered this in "Versteeg". Can any one plz explain me this?..

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Trackbacks are Off Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
[Gmsh] Error : Self intersecting surface mesh, computing intersections & Error : Impossible	velan	OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion	3	October 22, 2015 11:05
[Gmsh] Problem with Gmsh	nishant_hull	OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion	23	August 5, 2015 02:09
[CAD formats] my stl surface is seen as just a line	rcastilla	OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion	2	January 6, 2010 01:30
NACA0012 geometry/design software needed	Franny	Main CFD Forum	13	July 7, 2007 15:57
CFX4.3 -build analysis form	Chie Min	CFX	5	July 12, 2001 23:19

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:25.