
[Sponsors] 
February 19, 2013, 09:46 
Orthogonal Quality Issues

#1 
New Member
Simon Powell
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 
Hi everyone, I'm pretty new to CFD and I've waited a while to get to grips with it before posting on here but I'm having real problems with my mesh in terms of orthogonal quality so could do with some help.
I am trying to use a boundary layer using first layer distance that I calculated from a y+ value to be 0.002ft and the only way I can make orthogonal quality anywhere near a reasonable value is by making the mesh around this boundary layer really fine which leads to a massive number of elements. Is there a better way to go about this problem? Any other information required I can give I just didn't want to overcomplicate the situation. Thanks Simon 

February 20, 2013, 17:35 

#2 
Senior Member
Vangelis Skaperdas
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Thessaloniki, Greece
Posts: 286
Rep Power: 19 
Hi Simon,
What meshing tool are you using? For which solver are you creating the mesh, OpenFOAM? What is the surface mesh element length? Do you have sharp corners in the model? Indeed a combination of sharp edges (>90deg) and a high aspect ratio of prisms will lead to problems in OpenFOAM orthogonality or skewness for example by definition, but it would be interesting if you could give us more details. Regards Vangelis 

February 24, 2013, 17:21 

#3 
Senior Member
John Chawner
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas, USA
Posts: 275
Rep Power: 16 
Simon: While your question lacks important details about the type of mesh you're generating (structured or unstructured) I'll guess that the think your mesh lacks is a gradual coarsening as you move away from the wall and the tight spacing to your farfield. The manner in which you achieve that depends on your mesh type and the meshing software you're using as Vangelis stated above.
Best Regards
__________________
John Chawner / jrc@pointwise.com / www.pointwise.com Blog: http://blog.pointwise.com/ on Twitter: @jchawner 

February 24, 2013, 17:30 

#4 
New Member
Simon Powell
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 
Right so here is some more information about the problem I am tackling:
I am using ANSYS (FLUENT, ICEM) to investigate a validation model used to represent air flow around a generic frigate shape with geometry as follows: When I first posted I thought that the problems with poor orthogonal quality were causing a viscosity ratio limit of 10^5, I understand for external flows this figure should be around 0.10.2 so this is way off. I have now reduced the minimum orthogonal quality to approx 0.22 and still get the error occurring after about 50 iterations. I appreciate this post has deviated from the initial problem and so if a moderator feels the need to move it to a different forum that would be fine. Since I made this improvement I am now suspecting the problem lies in my boundary conditions. These are as follows: Symmetry axis down centreline of geometry Stationary noslip wall for the frigate Water surface is a zero shear stationary wall Velocity inlet with specified velocity and gauge pressure set to atmospheric Pressure outlet with gauge pressure set to atmospheric and backflow direction normal to boundary I am using the kepsilon turbulence model by means of specifying turbulence intensity and length scale as 1% and 1ft (according to other published works) The viscosity ratio limit appears to be affecting the cells on the frigate body. I have used an inflation layer using first cell distance as 0.002ft which I calculated to satisfy my y+ value to be 30. Hopefully I've made a rookie mistake somewhere that someone can point out easily enough. Please help me! Thanks Simon Last edited by simondpowell; February 26, 2013 at 07:14. 

July 27, 2020, 05:05 

#5 
New Member
AKSHAYA C
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 
I am facing problem with orthogonality error at trailing edge...Because of this only 21 elements the quality has come down to 0.1....Can anyone suggest me how to solve this....Please...


September 5, 2020, 04:02 
CFD Meshing

#6  
Member
sila
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 32
Rep Power: 11 
Did you used constant boundary layer thickness?
Did you check the prism layers of the wall in interface? Quote:


September 5, 2020, 04:04 
CFD Meshing

#7 
Member
sila
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 32
Rep Power: 11 

Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
[ICEM] Mesh Quality  alenglaro  ANSYS Meshing & Geometry  56  March 14, 2019 02:34 
[ICEM] The premesh quality is very good but the mesh quality is bad  lnk  ANSYS Meshing & Geometry  5  July 30, 2012 15:11 
[ICEM] Tetra mesh quality before and after prism layer  Chander  ANSYS Meshing & Geometry  0  December 25, 2011 23:04 
early stall, poor convergence, and mesh quality  everest  CFX  2  May 12, 2010 17:27 
[ICEM] Hex refinement negative quality afterwards  Anorky  ANSYS Meshing & Geometry  8  March 22, 2010 04:25 