CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion

[snappyHexMesh] Is it possible to set flow to laminar with porousSimpleFoam solver?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   May 11, 2016, 18:29
Thumbs up Is it possible to set flow to laminar with porousSimpleFoam solver?
  #1
New Member
 
Caio Martins Ramos de Oliveira
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 10
Caio Martins is on a distinguished road
Hello, everyone, I am new to this forum and I want to know, as the title of the thread suggests, if it is possible to set the flow to laminar while using the porousSimpleFoam solver. It seems it's possible to do so with the simpleFoam solver (http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/ope...inar-flow.html) so I thought it could be possible to use the porousSimpleFoam solver to solve my problem.

I am asking because I've been working on a low Reynolds number case which involves a porous region. The thing is that there are 3 regions in total: two of them involve a laminar flows and the third one involves a region which follows Darcy-Brinkmann's law. I followed a tutorial which creates a solver for the Darcy-Brinkmann equation (http://www.tfd.chalmers.se/~hani/kur...Final%20OF.pdf), however it is based on porousSimpleFoam and I am afraid it could not work for my low Reynolds number case.

I created the geometry on a CAD program, exported the .STL files (one for each region) so I could use snappyHexMesh to generate the mesh, and the splitMeshRegions utility to create the patches between the surfaces of each region. Aside from the fact that the region between my geometry and the box I defined in blockMeshDict was also meshed and given the name domain0, everything seems to have worked fine. I am guessing the domain0 region thing is unavoidable and I could ignore it by specifying appropriate boundary conditions on the patches between my geometry and the domain0 region. Is that a reasonable assumption?

Thanks in advance. I am really confused since this is my first time working with CFD and OpenFoam and I appreciate any help. Really.

PS: If necessary I could provide the whole case I am working on since I am just testing this setup to make sure I can tackle my real problem in the future.
Caio Martins is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 11, 2016, 18:42
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Caio Martins Ramos de Oliveira
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 10
Caio Martins is on a distinguished road
Sorry, this thread shouldn't exactly be on this forum. I made a mistake since originally I was going to ask about the meshing 'problem' only.
Caio Martins is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 17, 2016, 10:02
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Alejandro
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Argentina
Posts: 128
Rep Power: 12
ancolli is on a distinguished road
Could u solve ur problem? is ti possible to use porousSimpleFoam with laminar flow?
ancolli is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 17, 2016, 14:12
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Caio Martins Ramos de Oliveira
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 10
Caio Martins is on a distinguished road
I am still not sure. Sorry. What I was able to do was to solve the meshing problem and to add a porous region using the porosityProperties dict in the constant folder. Then I've used icoFoam which is a transient solver for laminar incompressible flows to tackle the problem. The thing is I want to observe how the transport of a species being injected into the mesh through an inlet evolves. That's why I am using a transient solver (not sure if what I am doing is right though... I'll have to discuss this with my advisor).

Anyway, I'll probably still look into this question. As soon as I find a solution I'll make sure I post it here.
Caio Martins is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
darcy-brinkmann, laminar, poroussimplefoam, regions, snappyhexmesh

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Laminar flow and wall roughness junbbung FLUENT 2 November 26, 2022 21:22
CFX Treatment of Laminar and Turbulent Flows Jade M CFX 18 September 15, 2022 07:08
Issues on the simulation of high-speed compressible flow within turbomachinery dowlee OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 11 August 6, 2021 06:40
parallel code samiam1000 SU2 3 March 25, 2013 04:55
Working directory via command line Luiz CFX 4 March 6, 2011 20:02


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:56.