|
[Sponsors] |
[Commercial meshers] Mesh check and quality problem |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
February 6, 2020, 05:14 |
Mesh check and quality problem
|
#1 |
New Member
FUJIAN
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
Hello everyone!
I am new in openfoam. now I am doing a case of indented cylinders. some info about my case: D 110mm, fluid 40D, height 1.5D, Re=1.5e4. I created the mesh by ansys meshing (all unstructured mesh), then converted it to polymesh. Then I checkMesh in the openfoam, it showed the following messages: Checking topology... Boundary definition OK. Cell to face addressing OK. Point usage OK. <<Found 174 neighbouring cells with multiple inbetween faces. Upper triangular ordering OK. <<Writing 354 unordered faces to set upperTriangularFace Face vertices OK. Number of regions: 1 (OK). Checking patch topology for multiply connected surfaces... Patch Faces Points Surface topology front 26159 51046 ok (non-closed singly connected) back 25764 50286 ok (non-closed singly connected) inlet 1040 2078 ok (non-closed singly connected) outlet 1046 2090 ok (non-closed singly connected) cylinderwalls 148572 248849 ok (non-closed singly connected) Checking geometry... Overall domain bounding box (-1.99996 -2 -0.0875) (1.99996 2 0.0875) Mesh (non-empty, non-wedge) directions (1 1 1) Mesh (non-empty) directions (1 1 1) Boundary openness (-1.69727e-17 1.13975e-17 -1.00043e-15) OK. Max cell openness = 3.42926e-16 OK. Max aspect ratio = 15.5333 OK. Minimum face area = 4.96858e-09. Maximum face area = 0.00335652. Face area magnitudes OK. Min volume = 2.20704e-12. Max volume = 0.000161957. Total volume = 2.19728. Cell volumes OK. Mesh non-orthogonality Max: 71.4973 average: 17.2003 *Number of severely non-orthogonal (> 70 degrees) faces: 2. Non-orthogonality check OK. <<Writing 2 non-orthogonal faces to set nonOrthoFaces Face pyramids OK. Max skewness = 2.66637 OK. Coupled point location match (average 0) OK. Mesh OK. Here comes <<Found 174 neighbouring cells with multiple inbetween faces. Upper triangular ordering OK. <<Writing 354 unordered faces to set upperTriangularFace <<Writing 2 non-orthogonal faces to set nonOrthoFaces Does anyone know whether the warnings will effect the results or not? how can I improve my mesh to have a high quality? thanks everyone!!!! |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[snappyHexMesh] High quality mesh for wind in complex urban environment | ziboaa | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 1 | January 12, 2021 15:33 |
[ICEM] Nuclear fuel assembly, Mesh Check: "missing internal faces, uncovered faces" | swparth | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 2 | June 27, 2017 07:12 |
mesh quality problem for displacementSBRStress motion solver | zhaozhenkai | OpenFOAM | 0 | January 22, 2017 11:02 |
[ICEM] mesh quality problem in fluent | turbotel | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 0 | February 23, 2011 22:24 |
[Commercial meshers] gambit import mesh quality problem with checkmesh | mrshb4 | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 0 | December 26, 2010 13:17 |