CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Programming & Development

Funny behavior of twoPhaseEulerFoam

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   February 18, 2016, 14:39
Default Funny behavior of twoPhaseEulerFoam
  #1
New Member
 
Bo Kong
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 16
bokong is on a distinguished road
I was investigating the mass conversation problem of implicitly solving particle volume fraction due to stiff particle pressure. And I built a case of a vertical periodic channel for twoPhaseEulerFoam with fixed gas flow rate. I made the volume fraction not uniform, with higher particle volume fraction on the top. The three following pictures are the initial condition, after 2 seconds and after 5 seconds. I used foam 24x here, instead of 30x due to the change of the pressure definition. And as you can see, I decomposed the domain to 4 processors.

init.jpg

2sec.jpg

5sec.jpg

Here is the case file, with the body force fvoption to keep gas flow rate constant.

verticalChannel_1.tar.gz

This is probably caused by the inconsistency of pphiPp on the processor boundary.

What is truly significant is that in this 5 seconds, the amount of particles increased 2%, which is a lot. That is due to the Laplace term in alpha equation, but even scheme was changed to "corrected", the mass still increases, which is a big problem for my current homogenous DNS simulations using my own solvers. If anybody has a good idea on how to fix it, I will be very grateful.

Last edited by bokong; February 18, 2016 at 16:07.
bokong is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 19, 2016, 04:37
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
anonymous
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 205
Rep Power: 12
ssss is on a distinguished road
If you consider this problem as a bug, you might want to report it on the OpenFOAM's mantis bug platform.

Do you have the same problem in serial?

If I remember correctly there were important changes for twoPhaseEulerFoam from 2.4.x to 3.0.x
ssss is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
residuals for velocity - twoPhaseEulerFoam avila.vc OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 1 May 27, 2019 07:37
Suppress twoPhaseEulerFoam energy AlmostSurelyRob OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 33 September 25, 2018 17:45
twoPhaseEulerFoam and complex geometry bsoubelet OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 7 July 2, 2015 10:50
Is twoPhaseEulerFoam applicable to 3D cases / delivering erroneous results? ThomasV OpenFOAM 0 November 11, 2013 08:10
twoPhaseEulerFoam freemankofi OpenFOAM 0 May 23, 2011 16:24


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:42.