substitute for moving meshes

Thangam · March 31, 2015, 08:31

If one has to simulate oscillating plate/solid wall ( sinusoidal function of time) in a domain (a simple piston movement in 'y' direction), the obvious way would be scenario 1. For brevity, assume there is no topological changes involved.

Scenario 1:
To use dynamic mesh (the dynamicFvMesh class) and move the mesh points via the prescribed equation.

solver: pimpleDyMFoam, dynamicInkJet etc.(almost all the dynamic solvers)

Scenario 2:
The fluid near wall takes up a zero velocity (assuming no slip). Now, With this in mind, using an oscillatingFixedValue boundary condition in 'U' at the plate/solid wall (working out the velocity of the fluid for the plate's displacement amplitude) as the fluid should obey the no slip condition and produce the flow features similar to a moving mesh ?

Will the result of scenario 2 be different to scenario 1? Is scenario 2 the right way to represent a near wall fluid with no slip? what happens to 'k' and 'pressure' in scenario 2?

solver: pimpleFoam should suffice?

Thanks
Thangam.

Bodo1993 · May 4, 2021, 17:01

Hi, I am wondering about a similar problem. The solver I use does not incorporate the dynamic meshing library. The case involves the removal of a solid wall (with thickness t) from the fluid 2D domain.
I would appreciate it if you can advise on the second scenario settings (fixing the solid wall and moving the fluid instead).

Thank you in advance.

March 31, 2015, 08:31	substitute for moving meshes	#1
Thangam Member Thangam Natarajan Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: Perth Posts: 70 Rep Power: 15	If one has to simulate oscillating plate/solid wall ( sinusoidal function of time) in a domain (a simple piston movement in 'y' direction), the obvious way would be scenario 1. For brevity, assume there is no topological changes involved. Scenario 1: To use dynamic mesh (the dynamicFvMesh class) and move the mesh points via the prescribed equation. solver: pimpleDyMFoam, dynamicInkJet etc.(almost all the dynamic solvers) Scenario 2: The fluid near wall takes up a zero velocity (assuming no slip). Now, With this in mind, using an oscillatingFixedValue boundary condition in 'U' at the plate/solid wall (working out the velocity of the fluid for the plate's displacement amplitude) as the fluid should obey the no slip condition and produce the flow features similar to a moving mesh ? Will the result of scenario 2 be different to scenario 1? Is scenario 2 the right way to represent a near wall fluid with no slip? what happens to 'k' and 'pressure' in scenario 2? solver: pimpleFoam should suffice? Thanks Thangam.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
bad momentum source, vortice direction with twoPhaseEulerFoam and non-ortho meshes	cutter	OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD	7	November 17, 2016 14:17
[Other] Can't import airfoil meshes successfully	klausb	OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion	7	May 26, 2015 15:51
Hex and Tet meshes - simplefoam comparison	danvica	OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD	10	January 4, 2013 01:18
Getting prism to inflate into mixed tet-hex meshes	Joe	CFX	16	October 10, 2011 07:06
Large 3D tetrahedral meshes	Aldo Bonfiglioli	Main CFD Forum	4	August 27, 1999 03:33

May 4, 2021, 17:01		#2
Bodo1993 Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2019 Posts: 148 Rep Power: 5	Hi, I am wondering about a similar problem. The solver I use does not incorporate the dynamic meshing library. The case involves the removal of a solid wall (with thickness t) from the fluid 2D domain. I would appreciate it if you can advise on the second scenario settings (fixing the solid wall and moving the fluid instead). Thank you in advance.