 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
[Sponsors] | ||||
simpleFoam vs Fluent for laminar flow. What is going wrong? |
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
February 1, 2019, 09:20
|
simpleFoam vs Fluent for laminar flow. What is going wrong?
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Lucas Cabrera
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 7  |
Hello!
I'm currently doing a comparison between OpenFOAM and Fluent by running a case of an incompressible, newtonian and laminar flow of an aneurysm. However they give me different results, and it looks like OF is giving me wrong results. You can see in the attachments below that OF one looks like its just a straight pipe. Both solutions used the same mesh (Created in OF using snappyHexMesh and later converted do fluent with foamMeshToFluent) and both are set to laminar flow. Below i've attached the case files. https://www.dropbox.com/s/dhx5599bhb...minar.zip?dl=0 Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance! |
|
|
|
|
|
February 4, 2019, 03:20
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
mahdi
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 32
Rep Power: 10 |
Hello,
Are you sure about BCs you have used in both solver? Regards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| About Some Concepts:Laminar flow, turbulent flow, steady flow and time-dependent flow | Jing | Main CFD Forum | 8 | October 5, 2018 17:02 |
| simpleFoam turbulent flow laminar results | NicolasB | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 22 | March 25, 2016 12:31 |
| Split boundary zone in FLUENT for mass flow | eishinsnsayshin | FLUENT | 1 | January 18, 2013 13:43 |
| Wrong Pressure countors for channel flow driven by mass flow rate or press gradient | ash-khan | FLUENT | 0 | June 21, 2009 10:02 |
| laminar pipe flow? Fluent gives wrong result | SAM | FLUENT | 2 | November 5, 2004 01:39 |
Linear Mode
