CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

Schemes and Solvers for skewed meshes

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By wyldckat

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   November 24, 2015, 18:42
Default Schemes and Solvers for skewed meshes
  #1
Senior Member
 
shereez234's Avatar
 
M Sereez
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: England
Posts: 352
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 13
shereez234 is on a distinguished road
Consider me a newbie in OpenFoam.

I understand OpenFoam gives pretty good convergence on nice meshes with low skewness and low aspect ratio. But we cannot avoid skewed meshes when the geometry gets more complicatied and when we have O grid Face Cuts. Nether can we always have low aspect ratio hexa/prism cells in the boundar layer due to not enough CPU power or other reasons

In this case. What are the schemes that are suggested? Do they differ when we move from steady state solvers to unsteady solvers?

I am using Limiters for gradients every where 1) the gradient scheme CellLimited leastSquares 1 for both Pressure and Velocity gradients. The velocity Field converges easily when the divergence term of Phi,U is set to limitedLinear 1.

Interpolation Scheme: default linear ,
SnGradscheme: Corrected
and Laplcian terms Gauss linear Corrected.

My questions are:

1) What is the ideal settings for the best Convergence of Pressure equation when you have a skewed mesh ( Max Skewness > 70)

2) Does the choice of Solver PCG or GAMG effect the solution? I always found recommendation to use GAMG but PCG is giving better convergence in my case.
shereez234 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 6, 2015, 15:49
Default
  #2
Retired Super Moderator
 
Bruno Santos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 10,975
Blog Entries: 45
Rep Power: 128
wyldckat is a name known to allwyldckat is a name known to allwyldckat is a name known to allwyldckat is a name known to allwyldckat is a name known to allwyldckat is a name known to all
Quick reply: I don't have explicit answers, but I vaguely remember being part of or reading about some discussion threads on this topic. After a bit of Googling:
wyldckat is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 6, 2015, 17:22
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
shereez234's Avatar
 
M Sereez
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: England
Posts: 352
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 13
shereez234 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by wyldckat View Post
Quick reply: I don't have explicit answers, but I vaguely remember being part of or reading about some discussion threads on this topic. After a bit of Googling:
Thanks for the threads. I have been able to improve the mesh and achieve convergence.
However, the new problem I am facing is the time step size. Beyond Stall Angle for an Airfoil with Vortex shedding at High Reynolds Number the time step required for accurate convergence is about ( 1e-4 to 1e-07) seconds i.e. ( courant number < 5). I recall that in Commercial Softwares I have used 0.01 seconds to 0.2 seconds to capture the same phenomenon.
On the other hand, I do believe that open source softwares does not come with everything that you dreamed for.

I have been using pisoFoam and pimpleFoam for my simulations. I would like to believe that may be some one has brought alterations/implementations to pimple algorithm so that it can support courant number > 5 ? If so can any one suggest links, references, codes? or if not, can any one guide me to a implicit stable method may be I will try implement it.

Regards

Shereez
shereez234 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 6, 2015, 17:30
Default
  #4
Retired Super Moderator
 
Bruno Santos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 10,975
Blog Entries: 45
Rep Power: 128
wyldckat is a name known to allwyldckat is a name known to allwyldckat is a name known to allwyldckat is a name known to allwyldckat is a name known to allwyldckat is a name known to all
Quick answer:
shereez234 likes this.
wyldckat is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
reactingFoam, correct solvers / discretization schemes DuarteMagalhaes OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 October 20, 2014 05:11
order of time integration schemes fisch OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 January 26, 2012 03:03
Reaction solvers megacrout OpenFOAM 5 July 8, 2011 10:54
Question About solvers and interpolation schemes titio OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 July 9, 2009 11:41
Higher Order FV Schemes for unstructured meshes Apurva Shukla Main CFD Forum 4 December 15, 2000 09:17


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:39.