|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Giles Richardson
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Cambs UK
Posts: 115
Rep Power: 15 ![]() |
I have been running simpleFoam for flow analysis over a car and initially set pref = 101325 (in the fvSolution file) which was giving quite large forces when integrating the surface pressure over a car body.
I then changed pref=0 and re-ran the same case, giving significantly lower force values (and more realistic CL & CD), when integrating the surface pressure on vehicle. Think it maybe be related to the surface pressure integration method in Paraview. Last edited by ufocfd; November 6, 2016 at 15:55. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Mahdi Hosseinali
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: NB, Canada
Posts: 273
Rep Power: 19 ![]() |
When you're solving incompressible flow the absolute pressure is not important, it's just the gradient (even when integrating an immersed surface such as a car body). If your solutions are correct velocity profiles should be reasonable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| prefcell/prefvalue, simplefoam |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| SimpleFoam setting with total pressure at inlet | dmaz | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | June 24, 2016 11:17 |
| using chemkin | JMDag2004 | OpenFOAM Pre-Processing | 2 | March 8, 2016 23:38 |
| [snappyHexMesh] determining displacement for added points | CFDnewbie147 | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 1 | October 22, 2013 10:53 |
| Cells with t below lower limit | Purushothama | Siemens | 2 | May 31, 2010 22:58 |
| Warning 097- | AB | Siemens | 6 | November 15, 2004 05:41 |