 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
[Sponsors] | ||||
July 12, 2017, 08:46
|
The symplectic integrator is explicit
|
#1 |
|
New Member
mohammad amin adibipoor
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 9  |
Hi all!
I'm trying to solve the wingmotion example in OF 4.0 using interdymfoam solver instead of pimpledymfoam solver in order to add free surface to the problem and split the domain into two phases but i get this error: Code:
"Foam fatal error: The symplectic integrator is explicit and can only be solved once per-step From function virtual void foam::sixDoFsolvers::symplectic::solve(bool, const vector &, const vector&, Foam::scalar In file sixDoFsolvers/symplectic/symplectic.C at line 72. Foam parallel run exiting" 
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 12, 2017, 13:02
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Jan
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Hamburg
Posts: 145
Rep Power: 20 |
Change from sympletic to newmark in dynamicMeshDict
Sent from my D5803 using CFD Online Forum mobile app |
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 15, 2017, 03:20
|
|
#3 | |
|
New Member
mohammad amin adibipoor
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 9 |
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
||
 |
| Tags |
| interdymfoam, pimpledymfoam, wingmotion |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Implicit vs Explicit | Houthuys | Main CFD Forum | 15 | February 3, 2017 11:17 |
| Newbie question about explicit and implicit methods | Yuby | Main CFD Forum | 10 | May 29, 2015 13:16 |
| Implicit vs. explicit treatment of variables at zero gradient outflow boundaries | eltenedor | Main CFD Forum | 0 | February 21, 2015 15:37 |
| Explicit method for more than two phases | sachinthakre | FLUENT | 1 | February 17, 2011 12:07 |
| Euler (explicit or implicit) | anybody | Main CFD Forum | 2 | May 8, 2006 02:12 |
Linear Mode
