|
[Sponsors] |
Cavity 3D : 4.1 versus 3.0.1 performance issue |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
August 10, 2017, 11:24 |
Cavity 3D : 4.1 versus 3.0.1 performance issue
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
Hi guys,
I’m using the cavity-3D case with a 3M cells mesh. I’m currently having a performance issue while using 4.1 version. Here is the output I got with 4.1. Starting time loop Time = 0.0001 Courant Number mean: 0 max: 0 smoothSolver: Solving for Ux, Initial residual = 1, Final residual = 1.68989e-06, No Iterations 3 smoothSolver: Solving for Uy, Initial residual = 0, Final residual = 0, No Iterations 0 smoothSolver: Solving for Uz, Initial residual = 0, Final residual = 0, No Iterations 0 DICPCG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 1, Final residual = 0.0477591, No Iterations 153 time step continuity errors : sum local = 2.75823e-08, global = 1.4455e-23, cumulative = 1.4455e-23 DICPCG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 0.0857006, Final residual = 9.88484e-07, No Iterations 528 time step continuity errors : sum local = 1.13433e-12, global = 6.91952e-24, cumulative = 2.13745e-23 ExecutionTime = 4.56 s ClockTime = 4 s While I got the following with 3.0.1: Time = 0.0001 Courant Number mean: 0 max: 0 smoothSolver: Solving for Ux, Initial residual = 1, Final residual = 1.68989e-06, No Iterations 3 smoothSolver: Solving for Uy, Initial residual = 0, Final residual = 0, No Iterations 0 smoothSolver: Solving for Uz, Initial residual = 0, Final residual = 0, No Iterations 0 DICPCG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 1, Final residual = 0.0477591, No Iterations 153 time step continuity errors : sum local = 2.75823e-08, global = -1.14771e-23, cumulative = -1.14771e-23 DICPCG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 0.0857006, Final residual = 0.00406192, No Iterations 149 time step continuity errors : sum local = 4.79613e-09, global = 9.74005e-24, cumulative = -1.73708e-24 ExecutionTime = 2.59 s ClockTime = 6 s Does anyone know why It would take twice the number of iteration to make the same step in 4.1 than in 3.0.1 ? Thanks in advance, Ludo |
|
August 11, 2017, 03:27 |
|
#2 | |
Senior Member
Gerhard Holzinger
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Austria
Posts: 339
Rep Power: 28 |
Quote:
In 4.1 you arrive at very small final residual (9.*e-7) compared to the 3.0.1 case (4.*e-3). So starting from the same initial residual, achieving a much smaller final one will take more numerical effort (i.e. iterations). So, apparently the behaviour of 4.1 and 3.0.1 is different for the case you ran. Since the case has not been posted, there is nothing more to say. If you make OpenFOAM to reach the same final residual, the number of iterations will most probably be quite comparable. |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Methods to optimize the performance of simpleFoam solver for lid driven cavity case | Sumeet Patil | OpenFOAM | 0 | October 15, 2016 05:06 |
[Other] issue 1_running several mesh configurations for a cavity model (tutorial) | Luis Batista | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | March 24, 2013 18:24 |
[OpenFOAM] ParaFOAM issue with cavity case | mschoenberg | ParaView | 3 | November 21, 2008 03:57 |