CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

Mesh refinement very diferent results

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   June 15, 2021, 23:09
Default Mesh refinement very diferent results
  #1
New Member
 
Gustavo
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 4
gustavoliveira is on a distinguished road
Hello,


I am trying to simulate a stepped channel using the multiphase/interFoam/RAS/weirOverflow example as base. For the stepped channel, I created a .stl file and start to tests some refinaments around the channel with the snappyHexMesh tool (and after I used the extrudeMesh tool to run in 2D).



If I use refinament levels (2 3), in the instant 2 seconds, the velocity magnitude is:





If I use refinament levels (2 4), in the instant 2 seconds, the velocity magnitude is:




The behavior in the two cases is very diferent. In the level (2 3) there are a air movement above the channel that I cant explain, while in the level (2 4) the water behavior is not what I expect.



Someone knows why?
Attached Images
File Type: png stepped-3.png (161.4 KB, 25 views)
File Type: png stepped-l4.png (149.7 KB, 24 views)
gustavoliveira is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 16, 2021, 08:32
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
anonymous
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 416
Rep Power: 14
simrego is on a distinguished road
Hi
On the left side as I can see you have giant cells. Try to resolve the interface better there. And also from (2, 3) -> (2, 4), is doubling the cells where the feature angle is high enough. I guess for you it is everywhere near the steps. So you halved the mesh size there. Of course you will get different results since in your 1st case it is clear from your figure that the resolution is not the best...
And what is your problem with the flow on the 2nd case? It is jumping over the steps. I think it can be possible at the begining of the simulation and probably the water will "fill" some steps as you go forward in time.


EDIT: also it seems like you are "loosing" water. maybe try to use less diffusive schemes if you can.
simrego is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 16, 2021, 09:04
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: UK
Posts: 668
Rep Power: 14
Tobermory will become famous soon enough
Agreed - you need to pay attention to the CFD basics. Improve your mesh, and make sure that you have enough refinement where you need it. Reduce your time step / Courant number. Pay attention to your numerical schemes. All of these will help reduce numerical diffusion, and improve your simulation.

Doing the above will probably increase your run time by orders of magnitude, but that's the price you have to pay for accuracy. Good luck my friend.
Tobermory is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[snappyHexMesh] snappyHexMesh sticking point natty_king OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 11 February 20, 2024 09:12
[snappyHexMesh] snappyHexMesh stuck when snap is turned on yukuns OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 3 February 2, 2021 13:05
[snappyHexMesh] Removing further cells after SHM zonda OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 14 September 15, 2017 07:50
[snappyHexMesh] SHM problem : KVLCC2 with appendage mesh sc.park OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 1 March 13, 2016 13:28
Moving mesh Niklas Wikstrom (Wikstrom) OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 122 June 15, 2014 06:20


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:08.