icoFoam and pisoFoam have different results in laminar analysis -- CFD Online Discussion Forums

March 8, 2023, 14:51	icoFoam and pisoFoam have different results in laminar analysis	#1
siavash_mansouri New Member Join Date: Mar 2023 Posts: 4 Rep Power: 3	Dear All, I tried to run 2D laminar cavity example (but 1m X 1m) with same specifications with icoFoam and pisoFoam(turbulence is off in turbulenceProperties file) solvers, but the results are different. It seems that they both use PISO algorithm with same settings but the result of icoFoam is much more accurate than pisoFoam for this case. Are they similar when the turbulence option is off? If you have any idea to answer this question, please leave a comment. Best wishes,

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Trackbacks are Off Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
icoFoam, pisoFoam, pimpleFoam unsuccessful transient solution of laminar flow channel	Andrew Gow	OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD	0	December 24, 2022 11:13
pimpleFoam vs simpleFoam vs pisoFoam vs icoFoam?	phsieh2005	OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD	45	March 22, 2021 09:14
Solver problem of pisoFoam or icoFoam	Raymond_90328	OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD	0	October 1, 2020 05:58
uRANS - laminar simulation using pisoFoam	cyln	OpenFOAM	1	July 15, 2017 18:28
what is the role of solve(UEqn == -fvc::grad(p));" in icoFoam pisoFoam and ...	mechy	OpenFOAM	10	January 17, 2012 12:05

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:13.