|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Pei-Ying Hsieh
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 317
Rep Power: 17 ![]() |
Hi,
This may be a silly question, but, I cannot help it not to ask. For a domain, say a rectangular box. Initially, filled with air. On the top surface, there is an inlet. Water flows into the domain from the inlet. On the top surface, it is atmosphere (except for the inlet face). It has been said many times that hex elements are superior than tet elements. But, how much better? can someone give a somewhat quantitative comparison - specific to interFoam solver. Thanks! pei |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Rolando Maier
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 89
Rep Power: 16 ![]() |
There can be so much more bad in a mesh than the cell shapes. I made pretty good experience with tet meshes. The only thing you should really care about, is not to use tet cells near a wall. There you should use hex or prism cells.
Rolando |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Srinath Madhavan (a.k.a pUl|)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Edmonton, AB, Canada
Posts: 703
Rep Power: 20 ![]() |
Hex meshes are well known to resolve boundary layers more accurately. Only if the geometry cannot simply be meshed using hex elements, resort to tet elements.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Create fine mesh that grows to coarse mesh (Urgent | CZ | FLUENT | 1 | January 3, 2009 10:36 |
Question on InterFoam moving mesh capabilities | ziv | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | April 23, 2008 09:11 |
InterFoam and moving mesh | fugu | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | March 10, 2008 16:54 |
InterFoam and moving mesh | guitton | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | February 17, 2008 11:38 |
Oscillatory mesh motion setup mesh flux ERROR | jaswi | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 5 | August 23, 2007 04:41 |