CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

Schemes for scalar in LES

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree2Likes
  • 2 Post By hjasak

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   October 14, 2006, 06:17
Default Hello, I am running a LES t
  #1
Member
 
anne dejoan
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: madrid, spain
Posts: 66
Rep Power: 17
anne is on a distinguished road
Hello,

I am running a LES to simulate the dispersion of
a passive contamimant.

I have tried linearLimited01 schemes for the scalar transport
equation but I still have negative values.

Could you please inform me about the best
schemes available in OpenFoam to chose to ensure a positive scalar?


Thanks You

Anne
anne is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 14, 2006, 09:54
Default Use Gamma01 with the coefficie
  #2
Senior Member
 
Hrvoje Jasak
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: London, England
Posts: 1,906
Rep Power: 33
hjasak will become famous soon enough
Use Gamma01 with the coefficient of 0.5 or 1. You also need to limit the Laplace scheme for that scalar, e.g.

laplacian(DkEff,k) Gauss linear limited 1;

On bad meshes you may need to use a lower coefficient, say 0.5

That should do it,

Hrv
__________________
Hrvoje Jasak
Providing commercial FOAM/OpenFOAM and CFD Consulting: http://wikki.co.uk
hjasak is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 14, 2006, 09:56
Default Forgot to say: temporal discre
  #3
Senior Member
 
Hrvoje Jasak
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: London, England
Posts: 1,906
Rep Power: 33
hjasak will become famous soon enough
Forgot to say: temporal discretisation may also give you unboundedness. A good way forward is Euler implicit (first order); if you really need second order you can try my new boundedBackward scheme.

Hrv
__________________
Hrvoje Jasak
Providing commercial FOAM/OpenFOAM and CFD Consulting: http://wikki.co.uk
hjasak is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 16, 2006, 03:22
Default Dear Hrvoje, Thank you,
  #4
Member
 
anne dejoan
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: madrid, spain
Posts: 66
Rep Power: 17
anne is on a distinguished road
Dear Hrvoje,

Thank you,

I will test your suggestions.

Anne
anne is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 5, 2007, 05:10
Default I want to try different ddt-sc
  #5
New Member
 
Per Nilsson
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lund, Sweden
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 17
borrbyper is on a distinguished road
I want to try different ddt-schemes.
In order to see the choices I wrote "x":
------------------------------------------
Creating field DpDt
--> FOAM FATAL IO ERROR : unknown ddt scheme x
Valid ddt schemes are :
6
(
CoEuler
boundedBackward
CrankNicholson
steadyState
Euler
backward
)
file: /home/workdisc/OpenFOAM/pen-1.3/run/boundp3/system/fvSchemes::default at line 27.
From function ddtScheme<type>::New(const fvMesh&, Istream&)
in file /home/dm2/henry/OpenFOAM/OpenFOAM-1.3/src/finiteVolume/lnInclude/ddtScheme.C at line 80.
FOAM exiting
------------------------------------------

When I try boundedBackward I get:
------------------------------------------
Creating field DpDt
Starting time loop
Time = 2e-06
Mean and max Courant Numbers = 0 0
diagonal: Solving for rho, Initial residual = 0, Final residual = 0, No Iterations 0
--> FOAM FATAL IO ERROR : unknown ddt scheme boundedBackward
Valid ddt schemes are :
5
(
CoEuler
CrankNicholson
steadyState
Euler
backward
)
file: /home/workdisc/OpenFOAM/pen-1.3/run/boundp3/system/fvSchemes::default at line 27.
From function ddtScheme<type>::New(const fvMesh&, Istream&)
in file /home/dm2/henry/OpenFOAM/OpenFOAM-1.3/src/finiteVolume/lnInclude/ddtScheme.C at line 80.
FOAM exiting
------------------------------------------

Why is boundedBackward no longer on the list?
borrbyper is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 5, 2007, 05:34
Default Easy: a bounded backward schem
  #6
Senior Member
 
Hrvoje Jasak
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: London, England
Posts: 1,906
Rep Power: 33
hjasak will become famous soon enough
Easy: a bounded backward scheme I wrote is there for scalars only: you cannot define what "bounded" means in terms of a vector or a tensor. Therefore, I cannot define a bounded second-order scheme for a vector.

In order to do this well, you will need to specify a scheme on a per-ddt-term basis. Set default to none and the code will ask you for a scheme one ddt term at a time.

Hrv
__________________
Hrvoje Jasak
Providing commercial FOAM/OpenFOAM and CFD Consulting: http://wikki.co.uk
hjasak is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Low dissipation schemes for scalar transport ivan_cozza OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 January 3, 2009 11:57
TVD-schemes NewBee Main CFD Forum 4 August 5, 2008 07:03
ENO schemes. J. K Main CFD Forum 12 June 28, 2002 11:16
TVD Schemes Sudeep FLUENT 0 October 14, 2000 21:31
TVD Schemes Matt Umbel Main CFD Forum 1 January 25, 2000 04:21


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:47.