|
[Sponsors] | |||||
Validation of reactingFoam for hydrogen dispersion |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Jakub Naider
Join Date: Oct 2022
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 5 ![]() |
Hello,
I am trying to validate my code for hydrogen dispersion using reactingFoam, according to validation model from this study (https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...18316616#bib34). When I ran the simulation it seems like the hydrogen dont disperse as expected, but rather behave as heavy gas and stays at bottom of the mesh. I tried to change the direction of the gravity, but nothing happened. Also, when I look at my residuals it seems like the solver doesnt compute density as it is always 0 and when I changed the solver from diagonal to PCG it stayed as diagonal at the log file. I uploaded the directories to https://we.tl/t-OxlPIUnfwx and I would appreciate some help. Thank you |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Member
m.reza
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 38
Rep Power: 16 ![]() |
Quote:
I am simulating cryogenic gas H2 and have the same issue. Could you please help me out? Thanks |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: UK
Posts: 869
Rep Power: 19 ![]() |
The answer to Jakub's original question about the rho solver is that the rho equation is very simple - it's an explicit system of equations, and so it does not make sense to solve with anything other than the Diagonal solver. The log file for the Diagonal solver always reports 0 iterations and 0 residual - that's working as intended.
For your question aboput cryogenic H2 and its buoyancy ... check the density predictions and confirm that the cold H2 is indeed buoyant; then check your gravity definition. Visualise the p field and you should be able to tell whether gravity is active and which way it is pointing! Good luck. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
m.reza
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 38
Rep Power: 16 ![]() |
Dear Tobermory,
Thanks for your reply. I checked all your points. But, I have still the same issue. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
m.reza
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 38
Rep Power: 16 ![]() |
I still have the same problem.
Last edited by m.reza; May 4, 2023 at 22:18. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
m.reza
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 38
Rep Power: 16 ![]() |
Could you please help me out?
Last edited by m.reza; May 4, 2023 at 22:15. |
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| DPM particle tracks with and without turbulence dispersion | sthinmind | FLUENT | 1 | April 3, 2018 10:56 |
| reactingFoam => reactingPorousFoam Solver Modification Validation | Filankes | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 1 | May 2, 2014 10:47 |
| CFX problem in ubuntu (linux) | Vigneshramaero | CFX | 0 | July 13, 2012 11:22 |
| CFX-Pre problem, pls help!!! | cth_yao | CFX | 0 | February 17, 2012 01:52 |
| Turbulent Dispersion for Coal Combustion | gravis | CFX | 2 | March 24, 2010 00:56 |