|
[Sponsors] |
problem with InterFOAM interface courant number |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
January 11, 2016, 10:29 |
problem with InterFOAM interface courant number
|
#1 |
Member
Yage
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 60
Rep Power: 12 |
Dear Foamers,
I got a problem with interfoam running. I am trying to simulate two phase flow with a submerged fixed body. I use setField utility to set the two phase region and the water phase has a constant current speed 2m/s But I dont know why the interface courant number is still 0 after several time step Any suggestion about how to address the problem? Regards, Yage Code:
MULES: Correcting alpha.water Phase-1 volume fraction = 0.727558664 Min(alpha1) = 0 Max(alpha1) = 1.00000004 GAMG: Solving for p_rgh, Initial residual = 1.4702655e-07, Final residual = 2.15068659e-08, No Iterations 1 GAMG: Solving for p_rgh, Initial residual = 2.19367882e-08, Final residual = 2.19367882e-08, No Iterations 0 time step continuity errors : sum local = 1.23804762e-11, global = 1.5117775e-13, cumulative = 1.51087321e-11 smoothSolver: Solving for omega, Initial residual = 0.11466698, Final residual = 5.25033964e-09, No Iterations 2 smoothSolver: Solving for k, Initial residual = 0.469281825, Final residual = 2.45700553e-08, No Iterations 2 ExecutionTime = 1609.04 s ClockTime = 1614 s Courant Number mean: 0.0204447859 max: 0.499108417 Interface Courant Number mean: 0 max: 0 deltaT = 0.00011661004 Time = 0.00172344337 |
|
January 11, 2016, 17:06 |
|
#2 |
Member
shashank moghe
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 32
Rep Power: 11 |
Looks like there is no interface. Can you post your setFieldsDict?
|
|
January 12, 2016, 03:07 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Anton Kidess
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,377
Rep Power: 30 |
Shashank, there must be an interface because the phase fraction is 0.7 and min and max are 0 and 1.
Yage, did you look at the field at this point with Paraview? Does it make sense what you see?
__________________
*On twitter @akidTwit *Spend as much time formulating your questions as you expect people to spend on their answer. |
|
January 12, 2016, 04:03 |
|
#4 |
Member
Yage
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 60
Rep Power: 12 |
||
January 12, 2016, 04:17 |
|
#5 | |
Member
Yage
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 60
Rep Power: 12 |
Quote:
Yes, I look at the domain with paraview and there is a freesurface. |
||
January 12, 2016, 04:39 |
|
#6 | |
Member
Yage
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 60
Rep Power: 12 |
Quote:
and the outcome after a longer running is still weird. the courant number is very small at the free surface. Code:
PIMPLE: iteration 3 smoothSolver: Solving for alpha.water, Initial residual = 1.19031101e-06, Final residual = 2.16770716e-13, No Iterations 2 Phase-1 volume fraction = 0.727573605 Min(alpha1) = 0 Max(alpha1) = 1.00000453 Applying the previous iteration compression flux MULES: Correcting alpha.water MULES: Correcting alpha.water MULES: Correcting alpha.water Phase-1 volume fraction = 0.727573605 Min(alpha1) = 0 Max(alpha1) = 1.00000453 smoothSolver: Solving for alpha.water, Initial residual = 9.37249465e-07, Final residual = 1.43841549e-13, No Iterations 2 Phase-1 volume fraction = 0.727573605 Min(alpha1) = 0 Max(alpha1) = 1.00000453 Applying the previous iteration compression flux MULES: Correcting alpha.water MULES: Correcting alpha.water MULES: Correcting alpha.water Phase-1 volume fraction = 0.727573605 Min(alpha1) = 0 Max(alpha1) = 1.00000453 GAMG: Solving for p_rgh, Initial residual = 0.000180148101, Final residual = 1.65743017e-07, No Iterations 8 GAMG: Solving for p_rgh, Initial residual = 1.42465044e-05, Final residual = 5.41884116e-07, No Iterations 1 time step continuity errors : sum local = 2.37251841e-11, global = -4.43079157e-13, cumulative = -1.07886437e-09 smoothSolver: Solving for omega, Initial residual = 6.67536969e-06, Final residual = 1.77979817e-08, No Iterations 1 smoothSolver: Solving for k, Initial residual = 4.46870005e-06, Final residual = 4.20645118e-08, No Iterations 1 ExecutionTime = 35840.95 s ClockTime = 36006 s Courant Number mean: 0.0159346502 max: 0.497184392 Interface Courant Number mean: 0.000190676158 max: 0.050893189 deltaT = 7.89779808e-05 Time = 1.26461786 |
||
June 10, 2020, 11:45 |
|
#7 |
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 10 |
setFields was buggy if I use in the quadrant other than first. Only in x and y axis both positive, setFields was working.
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Wind turbine simulation | Saturn | CFX | 60 | July 17, 2024 06:45 |
sliding mesh problem in CFX | Saima | CFX | 46 | September 11, 2021 08:38 |
Radiation in semi-transparent media with surface-to-surface model? | mpeppels | CFX | 11 | August 22, 2019 08:30 |
Waterwheel shaped turbine inside a pipe simulation problem | mshahed91 | CFX | 3 | January 10, 2015 12:19 |
DecomposePar unequal number of shared faces | maka | OpenFOAM Pre-Processing | 6 | August 12, 2010 10:01 |