OpenFOAM vs other codes? -- CFD Online Discussion Forums

April 19, 2024, 05:29	OpenFOAM vs other codes?	#1
LeChat New Member Join Date: Apr 2024 Location: France Posts: 10 Rep Power: 2	Hello openFOAM community! I am new to openFOAM. I used to used Gerris (10 years ago) and my former colleagues in Paris now use Basilisk (its successor). I believe both codes are Volume Finite (?), what would say the big differences are between the two codes (Basilisks and OpenFOAM). I aim to study systems with non-Newtonian rheology and in some cases two-phase systems with Marangoni and dissolution processes. What would be the most appropriate and easy to use? Thank you for your advice and clemency in asking this question.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Trackbacks are Off Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
How to contribute to the community of OpenFOAM users and to the OpenFOAM technology	wyldckat	OpenFOAM	17	November 10, 2017 15:54
OpenFOAM Training, London, Chicago, Munich, Sep-Oct 2015	cfd.direct	OpenFOAM Announcements from Other Sources	2	August 31, 2015 13:36
Suggestion for a new sub-forum at OpenFOAM's Forum	wyldckat	Site Help, Feedback & Discussions	20	October 28, 2014 09:04
Cross-compiling OpenFOAM 1.7.0 on Linux for Windows 32 and 64bits with Mingw-w64	wyldckat	OpenFOAM Announcements from Other Sources	3	September 8, 2010 06:25
Modified OpenFOAM Forum Structure and New Mailing-List	pete	Site News & Announcements	0	June 29, 2009 05:56

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:52.