|
[Sponsors] |
February 28, 2024, 08:50 |
faceAreaWeightAMI_3D_octree. Where is it?
|
#1 |
Senior Member
M. Montero
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Madrid
Posts: 153
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi all,
Looking how to resolve a problem where checkMesh states that AMI Weights are ok ( higher than 0.9) but the simulation fails saying that there is a face without target, I found this article from ESI. https://www.esi-group.com/sites/defa...e_Abstract.pdf "Based on these successful preliminary tests, the new implicit AMI framework has been integrated into the development branch aiming for release in v2112. Further tests with the full car model are currently being performed and will be presented at the conference". I have tried to use it but it seems v2212 does not have this development and neither develop branch. Any idea? |
|
March 24, 2024, 03:38 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Tobias Holzmann
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Tussenhausen
Posts: 2,708
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 51 |
CheckMesh is not reliable here. If you check the mesh after mesh generation, you check the AMI interface at this specific mesh position.
If you turn the mesh during time, the AMI interface and it's single faces will get new neighbour faces and we need to recalculate the weights each time step. Depending on your Center and rotation axis, it might happen that the rotation is not smooth and faces cannot find neighbours. The min Weight goes to zero and this is prohibited. Therefore, one can use ACMI or the new feature called "low weight correction". Using the latter one, the weights can go to zero even with AMI. One can test the rotation in prior using "moveDynamicMesh".
__________________
Keep foaming, Tobias Holzmann |
|
|
|