|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
We're looking at purchasing Comet-Works, or possibly Star-CD. How does everyone think these compare to packages like Fluent or CFDesign? Is Comet-Works easy to learn? Does anyone use Comet with Solidworks, and could you comment on how well that interface works?
We are looking for a package that is fairly easy to use, and could be used easily during the design stage - so good interactions with SolidWorks are pretty important. We like what we have heard about Star-CD so far, especially since we'd like the capability to use some of the more advanced features (like combustion) when we need them. Thanks for your feedback! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I quite like star-CD the vendors and support seem to be friendly and helpfull and the code is nice to use, the only other code i have used in anger is Phoenics which doesnt even compare, lets just say that Star-CD is to Phoenics what Buckingham palace is to a mud hut in the middle of the desert
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
it will takes much time to learn the starcd!and if you just for simple flow and heat transfer,cfdesign maybe the best!
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I have been a long time user of CFD and have evaluated many CFD codes over the years. I think Metry might need to be updated on the star-cd's latest product range - he may find his statement outdated! Maybe Metry should ask STAR for demo - assuming Metry is a CFD user and not a competitor to STAR, he may be pleasantly surprized!
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
STAR-CD OR COMET | Merkur | Siemens | 6 | June 5, 2006 03:13 |
Comet Vs Star-CD | Bhaskar | Siemens | 0 | September 16, 2004 07:59 |
Star-works | Joel | Siemens | 3 | January 22, 2003 12:16 |
COMET to orbit STAR-CD | Computational Dynamics | Siemens | 0 | May 4, 2001 11:04 |