CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > Siemens > STAR-CCM+

Moving reference frame for turbine simulation

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   November 29, 2017, 10:07
Default Moving reference frame for turbine simulation
  #1
New Member
 
Nicholas Rahl
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
Rahl141 is on a distinguished road
----------I have solved the issue, if you are experiencing the same issue please feel free to message me----------------


Overview of simulation
I am attempting to simulate a turbine by create a moving reference frame for the rotation and velocity inlet boundaries to simulate the ambient velocity.
The over all result should be the correct inflow velocity magnitude and direction over the span of the blade.


Simulation set up

For the spacial domain and discretion:
The geometry and mesh of a blade section can be seen in figure 1. I created the geometry by subtracting the blade from the fluid domain.
The directed mesher was used to mesh the resulting part.

For the region set up:
The part was assigned to one region.
The boundaries in use are the velocity inlet on one side, pressure outlet on the opposite side, walls on either side of the blade section with the shear stress specification set to "slip", and wall for the blade section surface itself.

A user define reference frame was created, with the origin and axis set in accordance to the simulation Lab Frame (see figure 2). The "Motion specification" node in physics values of the region was set for this reference frame.
All of the boundaries, except for the blade section surface, had the "Reference frame specification" set to the Lab Frame.
The blade section surface was set as "Region Reference Frame".


The issue

The relative velocity angles are incorrect.

I am unsure what the cause for this is, but i believe it is to do with my definition of which boundaries are rotating. A vector scene can be seen in figure 3 and 4 for the velocity magnitude in terms of the lab frame for the far and near walls (near and far in terms of position to the moving reference frame origin). As you can see from figures, the velocity is angled, with the velocity on the far wall being towards the blade section and for the near wall, away from the blade section.

This affects the relative velocity angle and magnitude and figure 5 and 6 show the relative velocity for the near and far wall respectively.

Surely the vector scenes for the velocity magnitude in terms of the lab frame should show the velocity going in one direction rather than angled? I have tried multiple configurations of the reference frame specification for the boundaries but to no avail. I also tried to create a two regions instead of just one; where one would be for the fluid domain and one for the blade. This was to set the motion specification for the blade region to solely rotate but i was unable to do this due to the limitations of the directed mesher being unable to mesh both parts when they are not subtracted.

Any help would be much appreciated and sorry this is quite lengthy! If i have not specified any key points please let me know.

Kindest regards,
Nicholas

Last edited by Rahl141; December 1, 2017 at 16:22. Reason: I found the solution
Rahl141 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 29, 2017, 10:08
Default Figure 6
  #2
New Member
 
Nicholas Rahl
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
Rahl141 is on a distinguished road
This is figure 6 (5 image cap)
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Figure 6 Far wall relative velocity scene.JPG (127.4 KB, 5 views)
Rahl141 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 28, 2017, 07:25
Default
  #3
Member
 
kiran Ambilpur
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: India
Posts: 47
Rep Power: 9
kiran is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to kiran
Hi,

have you created two fluid regions (one for rotating frame and another for housing, though both are fluid regions)? or only one fluid region ?
kiran is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
moving reference frames, relative flow, star ccm+

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Single moving reference frame vs Multiple reference frame for Wind Turbine CFD mrswordf1sh FLUENT 3 August 11, 2017 13:25
Rotating Cylinder (Moving wall vs Moving reference frame vs Sliding mesh) hamed.majeed FLUENT 2 January 17, 2017 13:18
Question about N-S eqs. in body fixed noninertial reference frame doctorWho Main CFD Forum 0 July 12, 2011 18:07
Constant velocity of the material Sas CFX 15 July 13, 2010 08:56
Error with Wmake skabilan OpenFOAM Installation 3 July 28, 2009 00:35


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:51.