|
[Sponsors] |
March 11, 2020, 12:07 |
Dfbi Forcing with VoF free surface
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 6 |
Hi,
I've been having trouble with my simulation of a dfbi body in a two phase (water and air) VoF simulation on Star. The body is subject to a downwards step force applied for 0.5s. I am using an overset mesh. The problem is that the free surface is very unstable and drops, residuals are high (1-100) and I can't seem to fix this, no matter the time step I use. I have tried a time step as small as 5e-5 and 20 inner iterations but the problem persists. The maximum velocity I have observed is 100m/s and the smallest cell is 0.075m. Has anyone had a similar problem? Or can anyone offer some suggestions? Many thanks in advance, Josh |
|
March 12, 2020, 02:48 |
|
#2 |
New Member
demirel suleyman
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Turkey
Posts: 28
Rep Power: 9 |
Hello,
It might be hard to capture a free-surface movement with 75mm mesh cells... There is a tutorial in the manual DFBI- Lifeboat with Overset Mesh. Maybe you can extract some valuable information from it. Demirel |
|
March 12, 2020, 04:10 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 6 |
Hi Demirel,
Thanks for your response. The 75mm cells are because I am anticipating waves of roughly 1.5m height, and for VoF waves Siemens recommend 1/20 of the wave height, perhaps this guideline doesn't work for 'self-generated' waves (as opposed to VoF wave model). It also recommends 1/80 to 1/100 of the wavelength for non-vertical directions, with gives approximately 1.25m. I'll try refining it in these directions, but the run time may end up being too long. I'm using a trimmed mesh with anisotropic mesh sizes by the way. I have also done the lifeboat tutorial, and they use a more coarse mesh than I do, and the default values also produce large residuals (~100) for momentum. Any further help would be much appreciated, Josh |
|
March 12, 2020, 12:39 |
|
#4 | |
New Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 6 |
Quote:
Thanks for your reply. From what you've said, my overset mesh is likely to be the problem, as my free surface drops within the overset region. I have attached a picture of this and my mesh. I only seem to have the one mesh continuum, is this because I have used automated meshing and you have used region based? Should I tick the box that says 'per-part meshing' on my automated meshes? Thanks, Josh |
||
March 16, 2020, 08:21 |
|
#5 | |
New Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 6 |
Quote:
Thanks for those screenshots and clips, they have helped me adjust my mesh slightly and after also changing the time order to first (with multistep) I seem to be getting some good results! Josh |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Free Surface model versus VOF model | zhubohong | CFX | 0 | December 16, 2019 21:32 |
VOF Free Surface height varying along the wall | mohibanwar | FLUENT | 0 | June 10, 2015 03:24 |
VOF simulation free surface caused by gas inject | rensb | FLUENT | 4 | July 20, 2006 04:45 |
VOF free surface tracking | LK | FLUENT | 2 | May 20, 2006 12:20 |
BC of free surface for VOF | Lin F.F | Main CFD Forum | 0 | September 13, 2001 12:09 |