|
[Sponsors] |
April 12, 2020, 15:31 |
Two parts
|
#61 |
Senior Member
|
This is because you might have created separate parts. All that's needed are separate bodies but these bodies should belong to same part. Then, you won't have any mesh interface.
__________________
Regards, Vinerm PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority. |
|
April 12, 2020, 16:07 |
|
#62 |
Senior Member
Jedidi
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 142
Rep Power: 6 |
that's true but i have all really seperate bodies only but i come out with the same problem in meshing
|
|
April 12, 2020, 16:30 |
Meshing
|
#63 |
Senior Member
|
In Ansys Meshing Tree, check if it shows single part or multiple parts. If it shows single part and you still get mesh interfaces in Fluent, then you have to check which boundaries are listed under mesh interfaces in Fluent.
__________________
Regards, Vinerm PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority. |
|
April 12, 2020, 16:37 |
|
#64 |
Senior Member
Jedidi
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 142
Rep Power: 6 |
1-i said the problem when i set it as bodies of the same part in on meshing and not in interfaces.
2- when plotting velocity or or displacement vs time in a specific surface eg : the piston , do u know how? Last edited by RJE; April 12, 2020 at 19:39. |
|
April 13, 2020, 04:31 |
Splitting
|
#65 |
Senior Member
|
Image makes the reason for interface clear. You need to keep both bodies, small duct and upper portion of the cylinder shown in the image, as separate bodies but in a single part, the way you have it right now. But you need to have a third body, which is lower portion of the cylinder, the one that will deform. Only that portion should have sweep mesh. The bodies shown in the image can have any type of mesh.
The reason for the interface is the existence of connections. For CFD, you should ensure that there are no Connections or Contacts at Meshing stage. Delete all the contacts under Connections and remesh. Do include the third body.
__________________
Regards, Vinerm PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority. |
|
April 13, 2020, 06:30 |
|
#66 |
Senior Member
Jedidi
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 142
Rep Power: 6 |
the third body should exist in the same part ?
|
|
April 13, 2020, 08:00 |
Part
|
#67 |
Senior Member
|
You have should only one part but either two or three bodies. The lower cylinder portion that will go under deformation should always be a separate body. The upper portion of the cylinder that has small duct attached could be either separate from the small duct or could be combined with the small duct. Part should always be one.
__________________
Regards, Vinerm PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority. |
|
April 13, 2020, 08:44 |
Result-simulation
|
#68 |
Senior Member
Jedidi
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 142
Rep Power: 6 |
Yes i get that.
However while running the simulation , i get out the plot of velocity and displacement vs time of the piston (moving), but i'm not sure about the result i get , because while entering the fuid with a pressure which increase little by little with time (pressure photo) , i was looking for a result like that this last photo and i don't really find an explanation for the sinusoide part in the beginning of the plot of velocity |
|
April 13, 2020, 09:45 |
Oscillations
|
#69 |
Senior Member
|
The oscillations could be physical or numerical. Try animating the piston with every time-step and observe it the piston really goes in the manner depicted by graph.
__________________
Regards, Vinerm PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority. |
|
April 13, 2020, 11:04 |
|
#70 |
Senior Member
Jedidi
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 142
Rep Power: 6 |
ok i'll try that.
i have few other questions : 1-sometimes while running the simulation i get this warning "floating point exception", although my time step is very small e-3 or e-4 , i think the some is diverging ? 2-i want to have video of velocity for eg , what should i do to get this video and not just an animation solution |
|
April 13, 2020, 13:47 |
|
#71 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 55
Rep Power: 10 |
RJE,
Are you still having the "negative cell volume" problem? We are doing something similar and I've managed to solve the problem For the piston chamber, use the sweep method when meshing. Then in Fluent, select Layering and smoothing. Set spring constant factor to 0.3 and convergence tolerance to 0.001. These settings seem to work for me. |
|
April 13, 2020, 13:56 |
|
#72 |
Senior Member
Jedidi
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 142
Rep Power: 6 |
yes sometimes i get negatives cell zones and sometimes i get this warning "floating point exception",
ok i 'll try that but i try sweeping last time in the piston zone, although that , they put some triangles although i oblige meshing to be all quad |
|
April 13, 2020, 14:05 |
|
#73 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 55
Rep Power: 10 |
I forgot to add, since the sweep method gives you a layered mesh, I set my timestep in such a way that the piston only moves a maximum of 20% of the cell height (at the highest velocity)
|
|
April 13, 2020, 14:53 |
|
#74 |
Senior Member
Jedidi
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 142
Rep Power: 6 |
how can i do that ?
|
|
April 13, 2020, 15:21 |
|
#75 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 55
Rep Power: 10 |
Quote:
time step (t) = 0.2*cell height (d) / max velocity (v) |
|
April 13, 2020, 15:33 |
|
#76 |
Senior Member
Jedidi
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 142
Rep Power: 6 |
i tried already this way but i get the same pb
|
|
April 13, 2020, 15:47 |
|
#77 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 55
Rep Power: 10 |
Have you made sure the upper section and the lower section are separate bodies? Meaning you should have 2 bodies. 1 body where it is completely static and the other where a dynamic mesh is applied. An interface will then be necessary to connect the two together without facing negative cell volume issues. In my case, that is what I did. In Solidworks I made them all separate bodies (4 bodies). I loaded them into design modeller and combined necessary parts using the "form new part" function. However I made sure to keep the dynamic mesh zone as its own single body so I can apply a swept mesh and use the layering technique. |
|
April 13, 2020, 16:30 |
|
#78 |
Senior Member
Jedidi
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 142
Rep Power: 6 |
yes i have made 2 bodies in the same part
i mesh the body close to the piston with mutizone option (quad) and the rest with tetra, but for the connexion? there is nothing |
|
April 13, 2020, 16:37 |
|
#79 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 55
Rep Power: 10 |
The connections can be seen by clicking on the "plus" sign. Can you post a picture of your mesh?
|
|
April 13, 2020, 16:46 |
|
#80 |
Senior Member
Jedidi
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 142
Rep Power: 6 |
yes, i sign up for connexions and there's nothing inside.
here's the picture of the mesh |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AVL FIRE ESE Diesel piston simulation initial condition | rdrd4u | AVL FIRE | 1 | July 15, 2015 01:53 |
Simple piston movement simulation | ReVl27 | FLUENT | 1 | February 20, 2015 08:28 |
variable density in single fluid simulation not running with total energy | viking | CFX | 2 | September 18, 2012 20:19 |
Expert parameter to stop the fluid flow simulation | KK | CFX | 1 | February 25, 2008 16:29 |
Terrible Mistake In Fluid Dynamics History | Abhi | Main CFD Forum | 12 | July 8, 2002 09:11 |