|
[Sponsors] |
April 14, 2020, 03:17 |
Mesh
|
#81 |
Senior Member
|
The mesh in the tet region, particularly the small duct, which I suppose is the inlet, is very coarse. This needs to be refined. Do note that only mesh is received by the solver, i.e., Fluent. Therefore, the mesh should represent geometry as closely as possible. As you can observer, the small duct does not have a cylindrical surface at all. For FVM, this does not pose a conservation challenge but certainly the numerics would have oscillations, possibly leading to what you observed.
__________________
Regards, Vinerm PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority. |
|
April 14, 2020, 06:45 |
|
#82 |
Senior Member
Jedidi
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 142
Rep Power: 6 |
no i get oscillations in the first simulation with part1
but with part2 i get error after running it. |
|
April 14, 2020, 06:48 |
Part1 and Part2
|
#83 |
Senior Member
|
Which one are you called Part1? Or does Part1 imply keeping everything as single body?
__________________
Regards, Vinerm PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority. |
|
April 14, 2020, 06:52 |
|
#84 |
Senior Member
Jedidi
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 142
Rep Power: 6 |
this one is part1
|
|
April 14, 2020, 06:55 |
|
#85 | |
Senior Member
Jedidi
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 142
Rep Power: 6 |
Quote:
|
||
April 14, 2020, 06:57 |
Connection
|
#86 |
Senior Member
|
If you keep any connections, then you will have to create interfaces; leading to interpolation error and extra time for interpolation. Connections should only and only be used when you have a moving mesh. Not in dynamic mesh.
There must be some problem with the setup for system with two bodies that is causing trouble. But you should use Part2 and not Part1.
__________________
Regards, Vinerm PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority. |
|
April 14, 2020, 07:44 |
|
#87 |
Senior Member
Jedidi
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 142
Rep Power: 6 |
ok, for meshing there's no problem if i have photo 1 from one side and photo 2 from the other side ?
2-when running i get from the beginning reversed flow, could u explain why ? |
|
April 14, 2020, 07:53 |
Setup
|
#88 |
Senior Member
|
I ran a case using conditions based on the images you shared. The graph shows the motion of the piston for first few time-steps. I used two separate bodies. And I used air as working fluid. Since I do not know the material properties for your material nor do I know the pressure or mass flow rate, I applied some arbitrary pressure just enough to push the piston down. Spring constant is 78750 N/m and preload is 877 N; as per your first image. I do not see any wiggles and the motion is quite smooth with 1 ms as time-step.
Since the spring is preloaded, it will push the piston upward with a certain pressure and that depends upon the area of the piston. For a piston with 20 mm diameter, the pressure would be around 2794450 Pa. If the pressure in the cylinder is smaller than that, piston will push the fluid out. If it is higher, piston will be pushed out. So, now you know why there is flow reversal in your case.
__________________
Regards, Vinerm PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority. |
|
April 14, 2020, 08:06 |
|
#89 |
Senior Member
Jedidi
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 142
Rep Power: 6 |
u mean by motion the displacement of the piston ?
|
|
April 14, 2020, 08:12 |
Displacement
|
#90 |
Senior Member
|
Yes, you are correct. What you see in the graph is position of the piston starting from an initial location.
__________________
Regards, Vinerm PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority. |
|
April 14, 2020, 08:31 |
|
#91 |
Senior Member
Jedidi
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 142
Rep Power: 6 |
i'll try it again then.
u seperate body using split function ? |
|
April 14, 2020, 08:49 |
Body Separation
|
#92 |
Senior Member
|
The method does not matter. You can split it using any method. I did not split; I created it that way.
__________________
Regards, Vinerm PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority. |
|
April 14, 2020, 10:28 |
|
#93 |
Senior Member
Jedidi
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 142
Rep Power: 6 |
hey again,
i'm sorry for disturbing u this much but it still don't working can i send u my project via mail so that u can discover what's wrong ? |
|
April 14, 2020, 10:31 |
Project
|
#94 |
Senior Member
|
Could you just share the snapshots of your OneDOF setup and dynamic zone setup, including Meshing Option details within Dynamic zone setup? Also, could you tell me the height of each cell layer in the deforming zone?
__________________
Regards, Vinerm PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority. |
|
April 14, 2020, 10:38 |
|
#95 |
Senior Member
Jedidi
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 142
Rep Power: 6 |
ok the cylinder diameter is 120mm and the lenght is 30mm
for the orifice ; d=4mm and 30mm length the cell taille du mesh =2mm |
|
April 14, 2020, 10:42 |
|
#96 |
Senior Member
Jedidi
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 142
Rep Power: 6 |
the piston surface (photo6)
|
|
April 14, 2020, 10:42 |
Layering
|
#97 |
Senior Member
|
Why do you have a deforming zone called layering? Delete that. And then run.
__________________
Regards, Vinerm PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority. |
|
April 14, 2020, 10:53 |
|
#98 |
Senior Member
Jedidi
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 142
Rep Power: 6 |
yes i have call deforming zone layering.
i delete it but still having same error after 2 step |
|
April 14, 2020, 10:55 |
Error
|
#99 |
Senior Member
|
Is the error related to negative volume?
__________________
Regards, Vinerm PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority. |
|
April 14, 2020, 10:58 |
|
#100 |
Senior Member
Jedidi
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 142
Rep Power: 6 |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AVL FIRE ESE Diesel piston simulation initial condition | rdrd4u | AVL FIRE | 1 | July 15, 2015 01:53 |
Simple piston movement simulation | ReVl27 | FLUENT | 1 | February 20, 2015 08:28 |
variable density in single fluid simulation not running with total energy | viking | CFX | 2 | September 18, 2012 20:19 |
Expert parameter to stop the fluid flow simulation | KK | CFX | 1 | February 25, 2008 16:29 |
Terrible Mistake In Fluid Dynamics History | Abhi | Main CFD Forum | 12 | July 8, 2002 09:11 |