|
[Sponsors] |
November 9, 2018, 08:35 |
Best box build for Flotherm: Xeon vs. EPYC?
|
#1 |
New Member
Richard
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
All,
I am new to the forum and hope to learn from the various discussions. I am a long time FloTHERM user (since 2003). I don't see much discussion about FloTHERM on this forum but I figured I'd ask. I see a lot of discussion about Xeon's vs. EPYC's at the moment. Has anyone done any testing between them using the latest version(s) of FloTHERM. At this point I'm not even sure that their solver is well suited for the EPYC's but those details are a little out of my league. I have a call into Mentor to see what info they have on that topic. Any input is greatly appreciated. |
|
November 13, 2018, 09:09 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 7 |
I'm building a 2x 7281 server for FloTHERM. When I checked with Mentor about a month ago, they had no data on Epyc performance. But, they did confirm the software will at least work with 32c/32t.
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Getting started with CyclicAMI | Algebraist | OpenFOAM | 4 | February 11, 2019 01:39 |
I get different results when I scale the 'falling box' tutorial | Hossein1 | FLUENT | 7 | August 19, 2017 02:52 |
[blockMesh] Merging multiple blocks of diferent mesh density. | Algebraist | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 3 | July 19, 2017 09:29 |
[DesignModeler] simply model, empty box | conquer | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 0 | March 28, 2014 18:26 |
Immersol Simulation of a Heated Box | Dong | Phoenics | 0 | March 2, 2006 21:20 |