CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Hardware

about new intel xeon cpu's

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree2Likes
  • 1 Post By flotus1
  • 1 Post By flotus1

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   July 17, 2023, 05:22
Default about new intel xeon cpu's
  #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 239
Rep Power: 16
naffrancois is on a distinguished road
Dear all,

Any of you has any idea about the performance with CFD of 4th gen Xeon Scalable CPUs ?

More specifically, how would Xeon 6430 perform versus Genoa 9354 ?

From what I can read about the specs, Genoa has 12 memory channels and 256MB L3 versus 8 channels and 60MB. Frequency is also higher for the Genoa.

But Genoa is 60% more expensive, is it worth ?
naffrancois is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 17, 2023, 05:55
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
flotus1's Avatar
 
Alex
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,399
Rep Power: 46
flotus1 has a spectacular aura aboutflotus1 has a spectacular aura about
If you are dealing with expensive per-core licenses: absolutely.

A Xeon Gold 6430 has 8 memory channels at DDR5-4400.
For the Epyc 9354 it's 12 memory channels at DDR5-4800.
And while cache sizes can not really be compared 1:1 for different architectures, the raw numbers are just too far in favor of Epyc.

Intel does not do itself any favors with their "all-in" approach to product segmentation for this generation.
Also, when comparing the price for the whole server, and the cost to run it, a 2000$ difference for the CPUs themselves is barely more than a rounding error. Even before factoring in license costs.
The reason to go Intel these days are a few edge-cases, where you know beforehand that your software does not play nice with AMD CPUs. Or benefits from Intel-exclusive hardware acceleration features.
naffrancois likes this.
flotus1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 17, 2023, 06:08
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 239
Rep Power: 16
naffrancois is on a distinguished road
Thank you Alex for your answer.

I should have specified, there is no license costs involved. You are right, when comparing the price of the full server this difference should vanish, but it does not that much at least with this famous big company. I still get Genoa solution more expensive by 47% considering a dual-socket configuration. Intel is equipped with 16*32DDR5 4800 and Genoa with 24*16DDR5 4800.

I am still inclined with the EPYC solution given all the benchmarks that we can find here in this forum, but I am not the one to convince
naffrancois is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 17, 2023, 07:17
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
flotus1's Avatar
 
Alex
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,399
Rep Power: 46
flotus1 has a spectacular aura aboutflotus1 has a spectacular aura about
Trust me, I know about the difficulty of persuading people that the more expensive, but faster hardware is the economical option in the long run
Dual Xeon 6430 will still perform pretty ok. Certainly faster than most setups from the DDR4 era. So don't beat yourself up if that's all you get approved.
naffrancois likes this.
flotus1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[OpenFOAM.org] OpenFOAM build on Intel Xeon Phi asaijo OpenFOAM Installation 31 July 26, 2017 10:35
OpenFOAM profiling on Intel Xeon and Xeon Phi processors Sumeet Patil OpenFOAM Programming & Development 3 April 28, 2017 14:19
Comparison between Intel CPUs Xeon E5-2643 v4 and Intel i7 5820K mechy Hardware 11 August 17, 2016 03:47
[OpenFOAM] Color display problem to view OpenFOAM results. Sargam05 ParaView 16 May 11, 2013 00:10
CFX11 + Fortran compiler ? Mohan CFX 20 March 30, 2011 18:56


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:31.