CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Modification of Mixing Length Damping Function to include Surface Roughness

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   January 31, 2020, 17:57
Default Modification of Mixing Length Damping Function to include Surface Roughness
  #1
New Member
 
Sharat Chandrasekhar
Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 6
RruffPaw is on a distinguished road
Surface roughness has been incorporated into the van Driest damping function in studies by van Driest himself (1956) and more recently by Krogstad (1991) and Crimaldi et al (2006).

These models appear to be directed primarily at external boundary layer flows with minimal pressure gradients. I get poor results when I apply them to pipe flow and do not recover the friction factors corresponding to the Colebrook model for rough pipes. The problem is exacerbated for high k+ values.

Are there any other studies that have considered the issue of how to tweak the mixing length to accommodate surface roughness in internal flows with strong streamwise pressure gradients?

Thanks

References:

1) E. Van Driest, “On turbulent flow near a wall,” J. Aeronaut. Sci. 23, 1007, 1956
2) P-A Krogstad, "Modification of the van Driest Damping Function to Include the Effects of Surface Roughness" AIAA Journal, vol 29, 1990.
3) J.P Crimaldi, J.R. Kossef and S.G. Monismith, "A mixing-length formulation for the turbulent Prandtl number in wall-bounded flows with bed roughness and elevated scalar sources", Physics of Fluids, vol 18 095102, 2006

Last edited by RruffPaw; February 1, 2020 at 00:56.
RruffPaw is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 3, 2020, 05:01
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
sbaffini's Avatar
 
Paolo Lampitella
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Italy
Posts: 2,157
Blog Entries: 29
Rep Power: 39
sbaffini will become famous soon enoughsbaffini will become famous soon enough
Send a message via Skype™ to sbaffini
Does it need to be the mixing length specifically? Otherwise you could give a look at the works on the Analytical Wall Function at Manchester and those derived from them.

For example, I haven't read it but, you could give a look at this:

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01879569/document

The point is that including non equilibrium effects into the mixing length model is already a task in itself. I know of this work only:

https://www.researchgate.net/publica...ssure_gradient

On top of this, you need to add the roughness effect.

Admittedly, I am no expert (or a fan) of mixing length models, maybe it has been done already...
sbaffini is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
damping, mixing length, roughness

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[Other] refineWallLayer Error Yuby OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 2 November 11, 2021 11:04
Surface Roughness Application in Star CCM+? Brock17 STAR-CCM+ 1 May 18, 2017 19:47
Using Surface Roughness to Approximate Dimple Surface Fang54 Main CFD Forum 1 January 8, 2016 09:40
[swak4Foam] installation problem with version 0.2.3 Claudio87 OpenFOAM Community Contributions 9 May 8, 2013 10:20
[blockMesh] error message with modeling a cube with a hold at the center hsingtzu OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 2 March 14, 2012 09:56


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:44.