|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
New Member
Niko
Join Date: Jan 2021
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 4 ![]() |
Dear Foamers,
I am currently simulating Stokes Flow arround a single sphere and try to compare the results to the analytical solution. Analytical Solution/Theory: We have incompressible flow at very low Reynolds numbers (< 1) in a cube geometry with a single sphere in the middle with periodic BC at all cube sides and noSlip on the sphere's boundary (Image attached). A force is added to the N-S-Eqn to enforce fluid flow solved with a steady-state solver (simpleFoam): ![]() Since the flow is at very slow flow, one can neglect the left-hand-side and the pressure drop should be equal to the added source term: ![]() We can compare the results with the analytical solution of Sangani (1982, "Slow Flow Through A Periodic Array of Spheres") by calculating the incompressible pressure and viscous force, which are used to calculate the non-dim drag K for spheres with different diameter via: ![]() with ![]() ![]() With this we can calculate the non-dim K which is in very good agreement with the analytical solution (Image attached). So here is the problem: Even though the K values are correct, the calculated pressure drop is not even close to the added source term as mentioned above in the N-S-Eqn. Further, the pressure field does not look correct as it should be a linear gradient through the domain, but this is not what it looks like (Image attached). Here is what I tried (next to refine the mesh): mappedOutlet BC for the inlet velocity, with zeroGradient velocity at the outlet and set a fixed pressure gradient between inlet (uniform 1E-3) and outlet (uniform 0). With this I get the correct pressure drop gradient and pressure field but the non-dim K is completely off (calculated again with postProcess -forcesIncompressible). This leads to my dilemma: Either a correct non-dim K or a correct pressure gradient.... Any explanation or help is appreciated. Am I missing something regarding the BC or the theory? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Uwe Pilz
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Leipzig, Germany
Posts: 743
Rep Power: 14 ![]() |
Cyclic b.c. arise problems. I recommend working first with an ordinary inlet and outlet first.
__________________
Uwe Pilz -- Die der Hauptbewegung überlagerte Schwankungsbewegung ist in ihren Einzelheiten so hoffnungslos kompliziert, daß ihre theoretische Berechnung aussichtslos erscheint. (Hermann Schlichting, 1950) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Water Sphere reacting to flow of air modelling | Jacee | FLUENT | 0 | May 25, 2018 09:29 |
Symmetry Boundary Condition for Flow Past a sphere | Qkarl | Main CFD Forum | 14 | March 6, 2018 03:32 |
Flow in canal with solid sphere obstacle | Gandel | FLUENT | 0 | May 3, 2017 04:59 |
superSonic Flow around sphere | prapanj | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | March 17, 2009 01:20 |
Stokes Flow | george | FLUENT | 3 | July 30, 2001 05:33 |