|
[Sponsors] |
January 28, 2008, 03:30 |
SORSCA & FLUINJ
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi, STAR-CD experts!
Now, I am trying to make user subroutine to perform CFD of fuel cell using STAR-CD platform. I'd like to ask one thing regarding on STAR-CD user subroutine. My problem is that the sum of scalars is not equal to 1. For example,in the anode side, H2 and H2O are being consumed there. So, I have assign those sink terms in SORSCA.f and also I assigned the corresponding mass sink in FLUINJ.f. However, I could not get the total mass fraction of 1.0. Is there anything to do to implement the scalar source/sink correctly? Berief summary of my setting is as follows: (Here, I assume the sink is constant) background fluid: H2 (density=ideal, viscosity=multicomp) additional scalar 1: SC1 = H2 (passive) additional scalar 2: SC2 = H2O (active) Both of two SC are solved through 'transport' eq. in SORSCA.f if (ICTID.EQ.2) then if (IS.EQ.1) S1P = -2.0 if (IS.EQ.2) S1P = -1.0 endif in FLUINJ.f if (ICTID.EQ.2) then FLUXI = -3.0 endif |
|
January 29, 2008, 05:01 |
Re: SORSCA & FLUINJ
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
The problem is that FLUINJ cannot selectively extract scalars: it just extracts them in proportional to the cell concentration. So if you specify FLUXI=-3.0 and the concentrations are SCALAR(1)=0.1, SCALAR(2)=0.9, then you will be extracting 0.3 kg/m3/s of SCALAR(1) and 2.7 kg/m3/s of SCALAR(2).
If this is what you want to do then you do not need a SORSCA. On the other hand, you need a SORSCA if you want to extract scalars disproportionately. The SORSCA corrects the FLUINJ, it doesn't replace it. To extract 2 kg/m3/s of SCALAR(1) and 1 kg/m3/s of SCALAR(2), having specified FLUXI=-3.0 in FLUINJ, then you would add FLUXI*SCALAR to S1P in your SORSCA; if FLUXI is positive it can go into S2P instead. Obviously you need to calculate FLUXI in SORSCA again too. With this coding, you should find that: - if you add the sources for scalars 1 and 2, you get zero. SORSCA is not adding or removing mass, only FLUINJ does that. - if the target sources are consistent with cell concentrations, you should find S1P = 0. - it diverges very quickly if you try to extract a scalar faster than is physical, i.e. the cell becomes "empty". |
|
January 30, 2008, 06:43 |
Re: SORSCA & FLUINJ
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dear Richard,
Really appreciated your kind explanation and comments. Thanks. KK |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Gas Concentration errors with SORSCA and FLUINJ | Emmanuel Resch | Siemens | 0 | April 18, 2008 11:04 |
FLUINJ + PDF COMBUSTION | Jorge | Siemens | 3 | March 14, 2006 12:50 |
fluinj.f | CMB | Siemens | 1 | October 16, 2003 04:22 |
cell Area in SORSCA & FLUINJ | july | Siemens | 5 | June 4, 2002 08:04 |
FLUINJ USER SUBROUTINE! | Spyridon | Siemens | 8 | May 22, 2002 05:31 |