CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Structural Mechanics

Q. Regarding the consideration of RPM value to validate assembly.

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   October 14, 2020, 01:33
Default Q. Regarding the consideration of RPM value to validate assembly.
  #1
New Member
 
SaiPrasad Chowdavaram's Avatar
 
SaiPrasad
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 8
SaiPrasad Chowdavaram is on a distinguished road
Consider there is an exhaust assembly consists of motor and blower. Motor rpm is 3000 and blower rpm is 2500.
I am performing modal analysis to check the characterstics of vibrations based on natural frequencies. In this particular problem, which rpm has to be considered such that based on that I need to improve the natural frequencies away from operating frequency to safeguard the assembly from failure. If I consider blower operating frequency and try to improve, somewhere the coincidence of motor operating frequency happens . Which rpm has to be considered in this problem .
Please let me know ur comments on this case .
Thanku & regards
SaiPrasad Chowdavaram
SaiPrasad Chowdavaram is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 14, 2020, 16:54
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
karachun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 244
Rep Power: 11
karachun is on a distinguished road
Both frequencies are important, you can not neglect one of them. Usually we try to move natural frequency +/- 10% away. Therefore your dangerous zone is 37,5-55 Hz because two dangerous zones from the engine and blower overlap.
karachun is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 15, 2020, 03:49
Default
  #3
New Member
 
SaiPrasad Chowdavaram's Avatar
 
SaiPrasad
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 8
SaiPrasad Chowdavaram is on a distinguished road
@karachun sir, thanku for the reply. So, according to ur explaination u meant to say I need to go ahead of motor operating such that both rpm's can be compromised . Plz correct me if I wrong on ur point sir .
SaiPrasad Chowdavaram is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 15, 2020, 17:57
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
karachun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 244
Rep Power: 11
karachun is on a distinguished road
Yes, if the first mode of exhaust assembly is higher than 55 Hz then structure is safe, resonance not possible.
karachun is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[foam-extend.org] foam-extend-4.1 cannot compile on Centos8 Ya_Squall2010 OpenFOAM Installation 2 July 22, 2020 02:03
[foam-extend.org] paraview not runing? (foam extended 3.2 and ubuntu 15.04) Milan2013 OpenFOAM Installation 23 April 20, 2017 05:49
[foam-extend.org] problem when installing foam-extend-1.6 Thomas pan OpenFOAM Installation 7 September 9, 2015 21:53
Install OF 1.6.ext on Arch based distribution miro2000 OpenFOAM Installation 4 October 9, 2013 14:39
OpenFoam 1.6-ext - RPM build errors preibie OpenFOAM 12 September 8, 2011 03:12


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:24.