|
[Sponsors] |
Y+ or Y*?which is more important for compressible flow simulations? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
June 7, 2013, 15:54 |
Y+ or Y*?which is more important for compressible flow simulations?
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Ehsan
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Iran
Posts: 2,208
Rep Power: 26 |
I have heard from someone that in compressible cases Y* should be considered not Y+ for turbulence.
for example as he said in low-Re method y*<1 is the condition not y+<1. have anyone heard something about somewhere or have any experiments? thanks.
__________________
Injustice Anywhere is a Threat for Justice Everywhere.Martin Luther King. To Be or Not To Be,Thats the Question! The Only Stupid Question Is the One that Goes Unasked. |
|
June 9, 2013, 14:15 |
|
#2 | |
Retired Super Moderator
Bruno Santos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 10,975
Blog Entries: 45
Rep Power: 128 |
Hi Ehsan,
Since you asked me for my point of view on this (caution: very limited point of view, since I'm not an expert in CFD!), here goes: All I can find on this topic is from a very old Fluent manual I found online using Google, is that Fluent uses the: Quote:
So, what I can figure out is that the class of the wall function itself will calculate the local y+ or y*, depending on the implementation the authors followed. As for the indicative value y+ or y*, it depends on:
Bruno
__________________
|
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
About Some Concepts:Laminar flow, turbulent flow, steady flow and time-dependent flow | Jing | Main CFD Forum | 8 | October 5, 2018 17:02 |
flow over a cylinder urgent! | kevin | FLUENT | 8 | August 11, 2015 13:00 |
Simulations Flow 3D over Flat plate | baoaero | OpenFOAM | 7 | June 7, 2013 05:53 |
Two-phase flow simulations | Philip Oosthuizen | Main CFD Forum | 0 | January 16, 2006 09:55 |
Flow visualization vs. Calculated flow patterns | Francisco Saldarriaga | Main CFD Forum | 1 | August 2, 1999 23:18 |